Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Nov 14;19(1):185.
doi: 10.1186/s12876-019-1102-1.

Methods for diagnosing bile acid malabsorption: a systematic review

Affiliations

Methods for diagnosing bile acid malabsorption: a systematic review

Ivan Lyutakov et al. BMC Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Background: Bile acid malabsorption (BAM) and bile acid-related diarrhea represent an under-recognized cause of chronic diarrhea mainly because of limited guidance on appropriate diagnostic and laboratory tests. We aimed to perform a systematic review of the literature in order to identify and compare the diagnostic accuracy of different diagnostic methods for patients with BAM, despite a proven gold standard test is still lacking.

Methods: A PubMed literature review and a manual search were carried out. Relevant full papers, evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of different methods for BAM, were assessed. Available data were analyzed to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of each published test.

Results: Overall, more than one test was considered in published papers on BAM. The search strategy retrieved 574 articles; of these, only 16 were full papers (with a total of 2.332 patients) included in the final review. Specifically, n = 8 studies used 75Selenium-homotaurocholic-acid-test (75SeHCAT) with a < 10% retention threshold; n = 8 studies evaluated fasting serum 7-α-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one (C4); n = 3 studies involved total fecal bile acid (BA) excretion over 48 h; n = 4 studies assessed fibroblast growth factor 19 (FGF19). 75SeHCAT showed an average sensitivity and specificity of 87.32 and 93.2%, respectively, followed by serum C4 (85.2 and 71.1%) and total fecal BA (66.6 and 79.3%). Fasting serum FGF19 had the lowest sensitivity and specificity (63.8 and 72.3%). All the extracted data were associated with substantial heterogeneity.

Conclusions: Our systematic review indicates that 75SeHCAT has the highest diagnostic accuracy for BAM, followed by serum C4 assay. The diagnostic yield of fecal BA and FGF19 assays is still under investigation. Our review reinforces the need for novel biomarkers aimed to an objective detection of BAM and therefore improving the management of this condition.

Keywords: Bile acid malabsorption; Biomarkers; Chronic diarrhea; Diagnostic accuracy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The selection process has been based on key steps including identification, screening, eligibility and, finally, studies actually included in this systematic review according to the illustrated flowchart

References

    1. Slattery SA, Niaz O, Aziz Q, Ford AC, Farmer AD. Systematic review with meta-analysis: the prevalence of bile acid malabsorption in the irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhoea. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2015;42:3–11. doi: 10.1111/apt.13227. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Oduyebo I, Camilleri M. Bile acid disease. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2017;33:189–195. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0000000000000344. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vijayvargiya P, Camilleri M. Update on bile acid Malabsorption: finally ready for prime time? Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2018;20:10. doi: 10.1007/s11894-018-0615-z. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hofmann AF, Small DM. Detergent properties of bile salts: correlation with physiological function. Annu Rev Med. 1967;18:333–376. doi: 10.1146/annurev.me.18.020167.002001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Camilleri M. Physiological underpinnings of irritable bowel syndrome: neurohormonal mechanisms. J Physiol. 2014;592:2967–2980. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2014.270892. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms