Accuracy and incremental yield of urine Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra versus Determine TB-LAM for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis
- PMID: 31727376
- PMCID: PMC6906254
- DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2019.114892
Accuracy and incremental yield of urine Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra versus Determine TB-LAM for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis
Abstract
The performance of urine Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert Ultra) for pulmonary TB diagnosis is unknown. HIV-positive and HIV-negative adults were enrolled at two health facilities in Kampala, Uganda. We compared the accuracy of urine Xpert Ultra and Determine TB-LAM in reference to sputum-based testing (positive Xpert MTB/RIF or culture), and assessed incremental yield. Urine Xpert Ultra had low sensitivity (17.2%, 95% CI 12.3-23.2) but high specificity (98.1%, 95% CI 94.4-99.6). Sensitivity reached 50.0% (95% CI 28.2-71.8) among HIV-positive patients with CD4 <100 cells/μL. Compared to Determine TB-LAM, urine Xpert Ultra was 9.4% (95% CI 3.8-14.9, P = 0.01) more sensitive, and 17.2% (95% CI 4.5-29.8, P = 0.01) more sensitive among HIV-positive patients. However, the incremental sensitivity of urine Xpert Ultra relative to sputum Xpert MTB/RIF was only 1% (95% CI -0.9 to 2.8). Urine Xpert Ultra could be an alternative for patients with advanced HIV infection unable to produce sputum.
Keywords: Diagnostics; Lipoarabinomannan; Tuberculosis; Urine; Xpert ultra.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials