Zoonotic Pathogen Seroprevalence in Cattle in a Wildlife-Livestock Interface, Kenya
- PMID: 31728795
- PMCID: PMC6910896
- DOI: 10.1007/s10393-019-01453-z
Zoonotic Pathogen Seroprevalence in Cattle in a Wildlife-Livestock Interface, Kenya
Abstract
A cross-sectional study was conducted to determine the seroprevalence of Brucella spp. and Leptospira spp. and risk factors of exposure in cattle in three zones with varying land use types and wildlife-livestock interactions. Five villages were selected purposively; two in areas with intensive livestock-wildlife interactions (zone 1), another two in areas with moderate livestock-wildlife interactions (zone 2) and one in areas where wildlife-livestock interactions are rarer (zone 3). Sera samples were collected from 1170 cattle belonging to 390 herds in all the zones and tested for antibodies against Brucella abortus and Leptospira interrogans serovar hardjo using ELISA kits. Data on putative risk factors for seropositivity of these pathogens in cattle were collected using a questionnaire. The overall apparent animal-level seroprevalence of brucellosis and leptospirosis was, respectively, 36.9% (95% CI 34.1-39.8) and 23.5% (95% CI 21.1-26.0). Brucella spp. seroprevalence was higher in zone 1 than in zones 2 and 3 (χ2 = 25.1, df = 2, P < 0.001). Zones 1 and 2 had significantly higher Leptospira spp. seroprevalence than zone 3 (χ2 = 7.0, df = 2, P = 0.029). Results of multivariable analyses identified animal sex (female) and zones (high interface area) as significant predictors (P < 0.05) of animal-level seropositivity of Brucella spp. For Leptospira spp., important predictors of animal-level seropositivity were animal sex (female), zones (moderate interface area) and herds utilizing a communal grazing reserve. The seroprevalences of Brucella spp. and Leptospira spp. in cattle were higher in areas with moderate to high wildlife-livestock interactions than those with rare interactions.
Keywords: Brucella; Land use change; Leptospira; Seroprevalence; Wildlife–livestock interface.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.
Figures
References
-
- Allan KJ, Biggs HM, Halliday JE, Kazwala RR, Maro VP, Cleaveland S, et al. Epidemiology of leptospirosis in Africa: a systematic review of a neglected zoonosis and a paradigm for ‘One Health’in Africa. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2015;9:e0003899. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003899. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Aune K, Rhyan JC, Russell R, Roffe TJ, Corso B. Environmental persistence of Brucella abortus in the Greater Yellowstone Area. The Journal of Wildlife Management. 2012;76:253–261. doi: 10.1002/jwmg.274. - DOI
-
- Barrett D, Parr M, Fagan J, Johnson A, Tratalos J, Lively F, et al. Prevalence of Bovine Viral Diarrhoea Virus (BVDV), Bovine Herpes Virus 1 (BHV 1), Leptospirosis and Neosporosis, and associated risk factors in 161 Irish beef herds. BMC Veterinary Research. 2018;14:8. doi: 10.1186/s12917-017-1324-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
- 57221138/German Academic Exchange Services (DAAD) provided additional funding through a scholarship programme, 'Special initiative, a world without hunger, 2015'/International
- CRP21-0A3-2017/Funding for this work was provided by the CGIAR Research Program on Agriculture for Nutrition and Health (A4NH) led by the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI)/International
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
