Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2019 Nov 15;19(1):116.
doi: 10.1186/s12894-019-0546-5.

Pelvic floor muscle training in radical prostatectomy: a randomized controlled trial of the impacts on pelvic floor muscle function and urinary incontinence

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Pelvic floor muscle training in radical prostatectomy: a randomized controlled trial of the impacts on pelvic floor muscle function and urinary incontinence

Joanne E Milios et al. BMC Urol. .

Abstract

Background: Pelvic floor muscle training (PFM) training for post-prostatectomy incontinence (PPI) is an important rehabilitative approach, but the evidence base is still evolving. We developed a novel PFM training program focussed on activating fast and slow twitch muscle fibres. We hypothesized that this training, which commenced pre-operatively, would improve PFM function and reduce PPI, when compared to a control group.

Methods: This randomized trial allocated 97 men (63 ± 7y, BMI = 25.4, Gleason 7) undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) to either a control group (n = 47) performing low-volume rehabilitation, or an intervention group (n = 50). Both interventions commenced 5 weeks prior to surgery and continued for 12 weeks post-RP. Participants were assessed pre-operatively and at 2, 6 and 12 weeks post-RP using 24 h pad weights, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite for Clinical Practice (EPIC-CP) and real time ultrasound (RTUS) measurements of PFM function.

Results: Following RP, participants in the control group demonstrated a slower return to continence and experienced significantly more leakage (p < 0.05), measured by 24 h pad weight, compared to the intervention group, suggesting an impact of the prehabilitation protocol. PFM function measures were enhanced following RP in the intervention group. Secondary measures (IPSS, EPIC-CP and RTUS PFM function tests) demonstrated improvement across all time points, with the intervention group displaying consistently lower "bothersome" scores.

Conclusions: A pelvic floor muscle exercise program commenced prior to prostate surgery enhanced post-surgical measures of pelvic floor muscle function, reduced PPI and improved QoL outcomes related to incontinence.

Trial registration: The trial was registered in the Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry and allocated as ACTRN12617001400358. The trial was registered on 4/10/2017 and this was a retrospective registration.

Keywords: Men’s health; Pelvic floor muscle; Prostatectomy; Quality of life; Urinary incontinence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

There are no potential conflicts of interest in the submitted research and all participants provided informed consent prior to inclusion in the study. This research involved human participants, however none were exposed to any potential harm, as all assessments made were either by questionnaire or non-invasive real time ultrasound approaches.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The number of “dry” patients (panel a) and changes in 24-h pad weight (panel b) for patients following radical prostatectomy within the intervention and control groups at baseline, then at 2, 6 and 12 weeks post-surgery. All participants were fully continent at the pre-operative assessment (baseline). * indicates a significant difference (p < 0.05) between groups at the relevant time points
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Changes in the International Prostate Symptom Score (panel a) and the EPIC-CP (panel b) for patients following radical prostatectomy within the intervention and control groups at baseline, then at 2, 6 and 12 weeks post-surgery. The IPSS (maximum score = 12) is as a measure of self-reported urinary symptoms and quality of life, with lower scores indicating better outcomes. The EPIC-CP is a health related quality of life measure for men following treatment for prostate cancer, wherein the urinary continence domain (maximum score = 12) assesses self-reported bother of urinary incontinence symptoms, with lower scores indicating better outcomes. * indicates a significant difference (p < 0.05) between groups at the relevant time points
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Changes in the Rapid Response Test (RRT – panel a) and the Sustained Endurance Test (SET – panel b) for patients following radical prostatectomy within the intervention and control groups at 2, 6 and 12 weeks post-surgery. The RRT tests uses real time ultrasound (RTUS) to measure the speed of pelvic floor muscle contractions, with lower scores representing a better outcome. The SET also uses RTUS to measure the endurance of pelvic floor musculature to sustain a contraction over time (maximum score = 60 s), with higher scores representing a better outcome. * indicates a significant difference (p < 0.05) between groups at the relevant time points

Comment in

References

    1. www.globocan.iarc.fr. Prostate cancer: estimated incidence: mortality and prevelance worldwide in 2012. 2018. https://www.iarc.fr/en/media-centre/pr/2018/pdfs/pr263_E.pdf. Accessed 8 Aug 2018.
    1. Walsh PC, Partin AW, Epstein JI. Cancer control and quality of life following anatomical radical prostatectomy: results at 10years. J Urol. 1994;152(5, part 2):1831–1836. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)32396-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shikanov S. Urinary and sexuality QOL 1 year following RARP. J Urol. 2008;180(2):760–66. - PubMed
    1. Shikanov SA. A prospective report of changes in prostate cancer related quality of life after robotic prostatectomy. J Psych Oncol. 2011;29:1157–67. - PubMed
    1. www.ics.org. https://www.ics.org/terminology/580. 2018. Accessed 8 Aug 2019.

Publication types