Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2020 Mar 13;33(3):243-251.
doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpz182.

Self-monitoring of Blood Pressure in Patients With Hypertension-Related Multi-morbidity: Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Self-monitoring of Blood Pressure in Patients With Hypertension-Related Multi-morbidity: Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis

J P Sheppard et al. Am J Hypertens. .

Abstract

Background: Studies have shown that self-monitoring of blood pressure (BP) is effective when combined with co-interventions, but its efficacy varies in the presence of some co-morbidities. This study examined whether self-monitoring can reduce clinic BP in patients with hypertension-related co-morbidity.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted of articles published in Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to January 2018. Randomized controlled trials of self-monitoring of BP were selected and individual patient data (IPD) were requested. Contributing studies were prospectively categorized by whether they examined a low/high-intensity co-intervention. Change in BP and likelihood of uncontrolled BP at 12 months were examined according to number and type of hypertension-related co-morbidity in a one-stage IPD meta-analysis.

Results: A total of 22 trials were eligible, 16 of which were able to provide IPD for the primary outcome, including 6,522 (89%) participants with follow-up data. Self-monitoring was associated with reduced clinic systolic BP compared to usual care at 12-month follow-up, regardless of the number of hypertension-related co-morbidities (-3.12 mm Hg, [95% confidence intervals -4.78, -1.46 mm Hg]; P value for interaction with number of morbidities = 0.260). Intense interventions were more effective than low-intensity interventions in patients with obesity (P < 0.001 for all outcomes), and possibly stroke (P < 0.004 for BP control outcome only), but this effect was not observed in patients with coronary heart disease, diabetes, or chronic kidney disease.

Conclusions: Self-monitoring lowers BP regardless of the number of hypertension-related co-morbidities, but may only be effective in conditions such obesity or stroke when combined with high-intensity co-interventions.

Keywords: blood pressure; coronary heart disease; diabetes; hypertension; obesity; randomized controlled trial; stroke.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Effect of self-monitoring on clinic blood pressure at 12-month follow-up by number of hypertension-related co-morbidities (16 studies). Blood pressure difference given in mm Hg. Analyses adjusted for age, sex, baseline blood pressure, and level of intervention, with study-level random effects for intervention and usual care. Abbreviations: SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; CI, confidence intervals; OR, odds ratio. Uncontrolled blood pressure defined by thresholds specified in each contributing study (see Supplementary Table S2 for details).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Effect of self-monitoring on clinic systolic blood pressure at 12-month follow-up by intervention intensity within specific morbidities. *Two studies only provided one patient each to the model. Blood pressure difference given in mm Hg. Analyses adjusted for age, sex, and baseline blood pressure with study-level random effects for intervention and usual care. Abbreviations: sBP, systolic blood pressure; CI, confidence intervals; CHD, coronary heart disease; CKD, chronic kidney disease.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Effect of self-monitoring on likelihood of uncontrolled clinic blood pressure at 12-month follow-up by intervention intensity within specific morbidities. *Two studies only provided one patient each to the model. Analyses adjusted for age, sex and baseline blood pressure with study-level random effects for intervention and usual care. Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence intervals; CHD, coronary heart disease; CKD, chronic kidney disease. Uncontrolled blood pressure defined by thresholds specified in each contributing study (see Supplementary Table S2 for details).

References

    1. Barnett K, Mercer SW, Norbury M, Watt G, Wyke S, Guthrie B. Epidemiology of multimorbidity and implications for health care, research, and medical education: a cross-sectional study. Lancet 2012; 380:37–43. - PubMed
    1. Wang HH, Wang JJ, Wong SY, Wong MC, Li FJ, Wang PX, Zhou ZH, Zhu CY, Griffiths SM, Mercer SW. Epidemiology of multimorbidity in China and implications for the healthcare system: cross-sectional survey among 162,464 community household residents in southern China. BMC Med 2014; 12:188. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ornstein SM, Nietert PJ, Jenkins RG, Litvin CB. The prevalence of chronic diseases and multimorbidity in primary care practice: a PPRNet report. J Am Board Fam Med 2013; 26:518–524. - PubMed
    1. Violán C, Foguet-Boreu Q, Roso-Llorach A, Rodriguez-Blanco T, Pons-Vigués M, Pujol-Ribera E, Muñoz-Pérez MÁ, Valderas JM. Burden of multimorbidity, socioeconomic status and use of health services across stages of life in urban areas: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 2014; 14:530. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fortin M, Lapointe L, Hudon C, Vanasse A, Ntetu AL, Maltais D. Multimorbidity and quality of life in primary care: a systematic review. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2004; 2:51. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types