Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2020 Apr;77(4):449-453.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.10.025. Epub 2019 Nov 13.

Efficacy of Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab According to Number of IMDC Risk Factors in CheckMate 214

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Efficacy of Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab According to Number of IMDC Risk Factors in CheckMate 214

Bernard Escudier et al. Eur Urol. 2020 Apr.

Abstract

In the randomized, open-label, phase 3 CheckMate 214 trial, nivolumab plus ipilimumab (nivolumab 3 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 3 wk for four doses, then nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 wk) had superior efficacy over sunitinib (50 mg once daily, 4 wk on, 2 wk off) in patients with untreated International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) intermediate- or poor-risk advanced renal cell carcinoma; the benefits were sustained through extended follow-up. To better characterize the association between outcomes and IMDC risk in CheckMate 214, we completed a post hoc analysis (n = 1051) of efficacy by the number of IMDC risk factors. The investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1 were evaluated. ORR with nivolumab plus ipilimumab was consistent across zero to six IMDC risk factors, whereas with sunitinib it decreased with increasing number of risk factors. Benefits of nivolumab plus ipilimumab over sunitinib in terms of ORR (40-44% vs 16-38%), OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.50-0.72), and PFS (HR 0.44-0.86) were consistently observed in subgroups with one, two, three, or four to six IMDC risk factors (p < 0.05 for treatment × no. of risk factors interaction). These results demonstrate the benefit of first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab over sunitinib across all intermediate-risk and poor-risk groups, regardless of the number of IMDC risk factors. PATIENT SUMMARY: This report from the CheckMate 214 study describes a consistent efficacy benefit with first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab over first-line sunitinib in all groups of patients with intermediate-risk or poor-risk advanced renal cell carcinoma, regardless of the number of risk factors they had before starting treatment. We conclude that there is a benefit of first-line treatment with nivolumab plus ipilimumab for all intermediate-risk patients, including those with one or two risk factors, and for all poor-risk patients, independent of the number of risk factors.

Keywords: CheckMate 214; Ipilimumab; Nivolumab; Phase 3.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1 –
Fig. 1 –
Investigator-assessed ORR and best overall response per investigator by number of IMDC risk factors. CR = complete response; IMDC = International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium; ITT = intent-to-treat; NIVO+IPI = nivolumab + ipilimumab; ORR = objective response rate; SUN = sunitinib.
Fig. 2 –
Fig. 2 –
Overall survival by number of IMDC risk factors. CI = confidence interval; HR = hazard ratio; IMDC = International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium; ITT = intent-to-treat; NE = not estimable; NIVO+IPI = nivolumab + ipilimumab; NR = not reached; OS = overall survival; SUN = sunitinib.

Comment in

References

    1. Motzer RJ, Tannir NM, McDermott DF, et al. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib in advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2018;378:1277–90. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Motzer RJ, Rini BI, McDermott DF, et al. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib in first-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma: extended follow-up of efficacy and safety results from a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. In press. 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30413-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Heng DY, Xie W, Regan MM, et al. Prognostic factors for overall survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted agents: results from a large, multicenter study. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:5794–9. - PubMed
    1. Choueiri TK, Motzer RJ, Campbell MT, et al. Subgroup analysis from JAVELIN Renal 101: outcomes for avelumab plus axitinib (A + Ax) versus sunitinib (S) in advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). J Clin Oncol 2019;37(7 Suppl):544.
    1. Motzer RJ, Penkov K, Haanen J, et al. Avelumab plus axitinib versus sunitinib for advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2019;380:1103–15. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms