Summative and Formative Style Anatomy Practical Examinations: Do They Have Impact on Students' Performance and Drive for Learning?
- PMID: 31733172
- DOI: 10.1002/ase.1931
Summative and Formative Style Anatomy Practical Examinations: Do They Have Impact on Students' Performance and Drive for Learning?
Abstract
Anatomical knowledge is commonly assessed by practical examinations that are often administered in summative format. The format of anatomy practical examination was changed at the Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine in Singapore from summative (graded; must pass) to formative (ungraded; no pass/fail) in academic year (AY) 2017-2018. Both assessment formats were undertaken online, but the formative mode used a team-based learning activity comprising individual and team assessments. This gave an unique opportunity to investigate: (1) the impact of two different online assessment formats on student performance in practical examination; (2) the impact of new formative practical examination on students' performance in summative examinations; and (3) students' opinions of these two practical examination formats. The class of 2021 perceptions was obtained as they experienced both formats. A retrospective cohort study was also conducted to analyze the Year 2 students' performance in anatomy practical and year-end summative examinations of cohorts AY 2015-2016, AY 2016-2017 (summative format), and AY 2017-2018 (formative format). There were no significant differences in students' performance between two practical examination formats. The cohort who experienced the formative format, performed significantly better in summative examinations (mean ± SD: 82.32 ± 10.22%) compared with the cohort who experienced the summative format (73.77 ± 11.09%) (P < 0.001). Students highlighted positive features of the formative practical examination, including team reinforcement of learning, instant feedback, and enhanced learning. These findings indicate that students continue to study for anatomy practical examination without the need for external drivers. The team-based learning style practical examination enhances students' performance in summative examinations.
Keywords: anatomy practical examination; formative assessment; gross anatomy education; medical education; spotter examination; summative assessment; team-based learning; undergraduate education.
© 2019 American Association of Anatomists.
References
Literature Cited
-
- Ange B, Wood EA, Thomas A, Wallach PM. 2018. Differences in medical students' academic performance between a pass/fail and tiered grading system. South Med J 111:683-687.
-
- Azzi A, Ramnanan CJ, Smith J, Dionne É, Jalali A. 2015. To quiz or not to quiz: Formative tests help detect students at risk of failing the clinical anatomy course. Anat Sci Educ 8:413-420.
-
- Bekkink MO, Donders R, van Muijen GN, de Waal RM, Ruiter DJ. 2012. Explicit feedback to enhance the effect of an interim assessment: A cross-over study on learning effect and gender difference. Perspect Med Educ 1:180-191.
-
- Birmingham C, McCord M.2004. Group process research: Implications for using learning groups. In: Michaelsen LK, Knight AB, Fink LD (Editors). Team-Based Learning: A Transformative Use of Small Groups in College Teaching. 1st Ed. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing. p 73-93.
-
- Bloodgood RA, Short JG, Jackson JM, Martindale JR. 2009. A change to pass/fail grading in the first two years at one medical school results in improved psychological well-being. Acad Med 84:655-662.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
