Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jan 6;375(1789):20180408.
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2018.0408. Epub 2019 Nov 18.

Becoming human: human infants link language and cognition, but what about the other great apes?

Affiliations
Review

Becoming human: human infants link language and cognition, but what about the other great apes?

Miriam A Novack et al. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. .

Abstract

Human language has no parallel elsewhere in the animal kingdom. It is unique not only for its structural complexity but also for its inextricable interface with core cognitive capacities such as object representation, object categorization and abstract rule learning. Here, we (i) review recent evidence documenting how (and how early) language interacts with these core cognitive capacities in the mind of the human infant, and (ii) consider whether this link exists in non-human great apes-our closest genealogical cousins. Research with human infants demonstrates that well before they begin to speak, infants have already forged a link between language and core cognitive capacities. Evident by just three months of age, this language-cognition link unfolds in a rich developmental cascade, with each advance providing the foundation for subsequent, more precise and more powerful links. This link supports our species' capacity to represent and convey abstract concepts and to communicate beyond the immediate here and now. By contrast, although the communication systems of great apes are sophisticated in their own right, there is no conclusive evidence that apes establish reference, convey information declaratively or pass down communicative devices via cultural transmission. Thus, the evidence currently available reinforces the uniqueness of human language and the power of its interface to cognition. This article is part of the theme issue 'What can animal communication teach us about human language?'

Keywords: cognition; communication; gesture; infancy; language; primates.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

We declare we have no competing interests.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. McNeill D. 1992. Hand and mind: what gestures reveal about thought, 416 p University of Chicago Press; (Cited 11 August 2015) See https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=3ZZAfNumLvwC&pgis=1.
    1. Kendon A. 2004. Gesture: visible action as utterance, 400 p Cambridge University Press; (Cited 24 November 2015) See https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=hDXnnzmDkOkC&pgis=1
    1. Perszyk DR, Waxman SR. 2018. Linking language and cognition in infancy. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 69, 231–250. (10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011701) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Spelke ES. 2003. What makes us smart? Core knowledge and natural language. In Language in mind: advances in the investigation of language and thought (eds Gentner D, Goldin-Meadow S). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; See http://www.wjh.harvard.edu/~lds/pdfs/spelke2003.pdf.
    1. Miller GA. 1990. The place of language in a scientific psychology. Psychol. Sci. 1, 7–14. (10.1111/j.1467-9280.1990.tb00059.x) - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources