Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Nov 14;16(22):4486.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph16224486.

Association between Use of Nutritional Labeling and the Metabolic Syndrome and Its Components

Affiliations

Association between Use of Nutritional Labeling and the Metabolic Syndrome and Its Components

Hyung-Sub Jin et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

In this study, we looked into the association between the diagnosis of metabolic syndrome (MetS) and nutritional label awareness. This study used data from the Korea National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey (KNHANES) for the years 2007 to 2015. The study population consisted of a total of 41,667 Koreans of which 11,401 (27.4%) were diagnosed with metabolic syndrome and 30,266 (72.6%) were not. Groups not using nutritional labeling had a 24% increase in odds risk (OR: 1.24, 95% CI 1.14-1.35) of MetS compared to groups using nutritional labeling. Use of nutritional labeling was associated with all components of MetS. Central obesity showed the highest increase in odds risk (OR: 1.23, 95% CI 1.13-1.35) and high blood pressure showed the lowest increase in odds risk (OR: 1.11, 95% CI 1.02-1.20). Subgroup analysis revealed that statistically significant factors were smoking status, drinking status and stress status. Groups that smoke, groups that do not drink and groups with high stress were more vulnerable to MetS when not using nutritional labeling. People not using food labels tends to develop metabolic syndromes more than people using foods labels. In the subgroup analysis, drinking status, smoking status and stress status were significant factors.

Keywords: Korea National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey; drinking; metabolic syndrome; nutritional labeling; smoking; stress.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Deaths by Cause (103 Item)/By Sex. [(accessed on 5 September 2019)]; Available online: http://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=101&tblId=DT_1B34E02&conn_pat....
    1. Alberti K.G.M., Zimmet P., Shaw J. The Metabolic Syndrome—A New Worldwide Definition. The Lancet. 2005;366:1059–1062. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67402-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ford E.S., Giles W.H., Dietz W.H. Prevalence of the Metabolic Syndrome among US Adults: Findings From the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. JAMA. 2002;287:356–359. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.3.356. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Laakso M., Kuusisto J., Stančáková A., Kuulasmaa T., Pajukanta P., Lusis A.J., Collins F.S., Mohlke K.L., Boehnke M. The Metabolic Syndrome in Men Study: A Resource for Studies of Metabolic and Cardiovascular Diseases. J. Lipid Res. 2017;58:481–493. doi: 10.1194/jlr.O072629. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ford E.S., Li C., Zhao G. Prevalence and Correlates of Metabolic Syndrome Based on a Harmonious Definition among Adults in the US*: Metabolic Syndrome: A Harmonious Definition. J. Diabetes. 2010;2:180–193. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-0407.2010.00078.x. - DOI - PubMed