Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Feb;34(1):293-306.
doi: 10.1016/j.hoc.2019.09.010. Epub 2019 Oct 31.

Imaging for Response Assessment in Radiation Oncology: Current and Emerging Techniques

Affiliations
Review

Imaging for Response Assessment in Radiation Oncology: Current and Emerging Techniques

Sonja Stieb et al. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2020 Feb.

Abstract

Imaging in radiation oncology is essential for the evaluation of treatment response in tumors and organs at risk. This influences further treatment decisions and could possibly be used to adapt therapy. This review article focuses on the currently used imaging modalities for response assessment in radiation oncology and gives an overview of new and promising techniques within this field.

Keywords: CT; Functional imaging; MRI; Organs at risk; PET; Radiation oncology; Response assessment; Tumor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Example of a patient with a lung adenocarcinoma metastasis at the left skull base (red arrow). Left: 140 keV DE-CT (window level: −100 – 250 HU), middle: 60 keV DE-CT (window level: −100 – 250 HU), right: Iodine map of DE-CT (window level: −10 – 100 HU).
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Example of a patient with T2 base of tongue (BOT) tumor and ipsilateral neck lymph node. Left: Treatment plan with BOT tumor delineated in dark green, lymph node in light green and clinical target volume (CTV) in red; middle: PET/CT before treatment (window level for PET: 0.5 – 22 SUV); right: PET/CT 3 months after radiochemotherapy (window level for PET: 0.5 – 22 SUV).
Figure 3:
Figure 3:
54-year old patient with bilateral tonsil cancer stage IVA. Parotid gland structures are highlighted in yellow and pink and were rigidly propagated from T2 image (left) to DIXON (middle) and ADC map (right side).

References

    1. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(2):228–247. - PubMed
    1. Thorwarth D Functional imaging for radiotherapy treatment planning: current status and future directions-a review. Br J Radiol. 2015;88(1051):20150056. - PMC - PubMed
    1. O’Connor JP, Tofts PS, Miles KA, Parkes LM, Thompson G, Jackson A. Dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging techniques: CT and MRI. Br J Radiol. 2011;84 Spec No 2:S112–120. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Coolens C, Driscoll B, Chung C, et al. Automated voxel-based analysis of volumetric dynamic contrast-enhanced CT data improves measurement of serial changes in tumor vascular biomarkers. International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics. 2015;91(1):48–57. - PubMed
    1. Cao Y, Pan C, Balter JM, et al. Liver function after irradiation based on computed tomographic portal vein perfusion imaging. International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics. 2008;70(1):154–160. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types