Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Oct 30;16(1):144.
doi: 10.1186/s12984-019-0610-0.

JNER at 15 years: analysis of the state of neuroengineering and rehabilitation

Affiliations

JNER at 15 years: analysis of the state of neuroengineering and rehabilitation

David J Reinkensmeyer. J Neuroeng Rehabil. .

Abstract

On JNER's 15th anniversary, this editorial analyzes the state of the field of neuroengineering and rehabilitation. I first discuss some ways that the nature of neurorehabilitation research has evolved in the past 15 years based on my perspective as editor-in-chief of JNER and a researcher in the field. I highlight increasing reliance on advanced technologies, improved rigor and openness of research, and three, related, new paradigms - wearable devices, the Cybathlon competition, and human augmentation studies - indicators that neurorehabilitation is squarely in the age of wearability. Then, I briefly speculate on how the field might make progress going forward, highlighting the need for new models of training and learning driven by big data, better personalization and targeting, and an increase in the quantity and quality of usability and uptake studies to improve translation.

Keywords: Movement; Neuroengineering; Neuroscience; Rehabilitation; Robotics; Wearable.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

DR receives an honorarium for serving as Editor-in-Chief as JNER. DR also holds equity in and has consulted for two rehabilitation technology companies, Flint Rehabilitation Devices and Hocoma. The terms of these relationships have been reviewed by the University of California Conflict of Interest committee.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Word cloud generated from the titles of 1231 papers published in JNER over the past 15 years. One sees the integration of clinical and technological terminology. Generated at https://www.jasondavies.com/wordcloud/
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Representative figures from the most accessed papers of JNER [3, 4]. The virtual reality figure is from [5]. These highly accessed papers highlight the strong public interest in the blending of technology with rehabilitation
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Evidence of the increasing role of technology in rehabilitation science. Shown are the frequency of specialties listed by principal investigators in rehabilitation grant application bisosketches. Percentages were calculated from 1178 applications (first submissions and first re-submissions) between 2007 and 2018. Data were shown at the December 3, 2018 National Advisory Board for Medical Rehabilitation Research meeting and were produced by NIH Office of Portfolio Analysis
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Conceptual timeline of the integration of various technologies in movement rehabilitation research and practice. The current state of the field is characterized by increased use of artificial intelligence, generation of big data, and experimentation with adjuvant therapies. We are squarely in the age of wearability, and wearable devices for rehabilitation are spinning out to applications in human augmentation
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Analysis of the title, abstracts, and key words of the 1231 papers published in JNER over the past 15 years for the number (top) and percent (bottom) of papers that use the words robot*, exo*, wear*, virtual, sensor, brain-computer, and model. The fastest growing terms over the past 5 years are “exo*”, “wear*” and “robot*”

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bonato P. JNER: a forum to discuss how neuroscience and biomedical engineering are reshaping physical medicine & rehabilitation. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2004;1:1. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Reinkensmeyer DJ, et al. How a diverse research ecosystem has generated new rehabilitation technologies: review of NIDILRR’s rehabilitation engineering research centers. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017;14:109. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Patel Shyamal, Park Hyung, Bonato Paolo, Chan Leighton, Rodgers Mary. A review of wearable sensors and systems with application in rehabilitation. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation. 2012;9(1):21. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-9-21. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sveistrup H. Motor rehabilitation using virtual reality. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2004;1:10. - PMC - PubMed
    1. “Why We Love AND Hate our Robots.” Available: http://www.neuropt.org/docs/default-source/csm-2019-handouts/why-we-love....

Publication types

MeSH terms