Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Sep;52(3):697-709.
doi: 10.1002/jmri.26985. Epub 2019 Nov 20.

Role of Breast MRI in the Evaluation and Detection of DCIS: Opportunities and Challenges

Affiliations
Review

Role of Breast MRI in the Evaluation and Detection of DCIS: Opportunities and Challenges

Heather I Greenwood et al. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2020 Sep.

Abstract

Historically, breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was not considered an effective modality in the evaluation of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Over the past decade this has changed, with studies demonstrating that MRI is the most sensitive imaging tool for detection of all grades of DCIS. It has been suggested that not only is breast MRI the most sensitive imaging tool for detection but it may also detect the most clinically relevant DCIS lesions. The role and outcomes of MRI in the preoperative setting for patients with DCIS remains controversial; however, several studies have shown benefit in the preoperative evaluation of extent of disease as well as predicting an underlying invasive component. The most common presentation of DCIS on MRI is nonmass enhancement (NME) in a linear or segmental distribution pattern. Maximizing breast MRI spatial resolution is therefore beneficial, given the frequent presentation of DCIS as NME on MRI. Emerging MRI techniques, such as diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), have shown promising potential to discriminate DCIS from benign and invasive lesions. Future opportunities including advanced imaging visual techniques, radiomics/radiogenomics, and machine learning / artificial intelligence may also be applicable to the detection and treatment of DCIS. Level of Evidence: 3 Technical Efficacy Stage: 3 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;52:697-709.

Keywords: breast MRI; diffusion tensor imaging; diffusion weighted imaging; ductal carcinoma in situ.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ozzello L. Ultrastructure of intra-epithelial carcinomas of the breast. Cancer 1971;28:1508-1515.
    1. Recht A, Rutgers EJ, Fentiman IS, Kurtz JM, Mansel RE, Sloane JP. The fourth EORTC DCIS Consensus meeting (Chateau Marquette, Heemskerk, The Netherlands, 23-24 January 1998)-Conference report. Eur J Cancer 1998;34:1664-1669.
    1. Elston CW, Sloane JP, Amendoeira I, et al. Causes of inconsistency in diagnosing and classifying intraductal proliferations of the breast. European Commission Working Group on Breast Screening Pathology. Eur J Cancer 2000;36:1769-1772.
    1. Burstein HJ, Polyak K, Wong JS, Lester SC, Kaelin CM. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. N Engl J Med 2004;350:1430-1441.
    1. Lagios MD. Heterogeneity of duct carcinoma in situ (DCIS): Relationship of grade and subtype analysis to local recurrence and risk of invasive transformation. Cancer Lett 1995;90:97-102.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources