Vitrectomy for Idiopathic Macular Hole in Patients Aged 80 Years or Older: Efficacy and Safety
- PMID: 31747306
- DOI: 10.1080/02713683.2019.1695842
Vitrectomy for Idiopathic Macular Hole in Patients Aged 80 Years or Older: Efficacy and Safety
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the efficacy and safety of idiopathic macular hole (MH) surgery in elderly patients (≥ 80 years of age).Methods: Prospective study enrolled consecutive patients who underwent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling under retrobulbar anesthesia between February 2016 and May 2018. Twenty-eight eyes of 28 patients aged 80 years or older were classified into the elderly group, a matched group of 56 eyes from 56 younger patients as the control group. The main outcome measures included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and intraoperative and postoperative complications.Results: Statistically, there was no significant difference in visual acuity improvement and incidences of complications between the elderly group and the control group (p = .784 and p = .712, respectively). No operation in either group was postponed or canceled due to complications associated with retrobulbar anesthesia, or physical discomfort before and during the operation. Moreover, no case suffered from myocardial infarction, stroke or death during the perioperative period. Except for one case of retinal detachment postoperatively in the control group, no case required a secondary surgery. All complications were successfully resolved or managed.Conclusions: The results from our study indicate the efficacy and safety of vitrectomy for idiopathic macular hole in patients aged 80 years or older, and idiopathic MH surgery should not be denied on basis of patient age alone.
Keywords: Idiopathic macular hole; complication; elderly; pars plana vitrectomy; safety.
Similar articles
-
Long-term follow-up of indocyanine green-assisted peeling of the retinal internal limiting membrane during vitrectomy surgery for idiopathic macular hole repair.Ophthalmology. 2004 Dec;111(12):2246-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.05.037. Ophthalmology. 2004. PMID: 15582081
-
Phacovitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling for idiopathic macular hole.Can J Ophthalmol. 2002 Aug;37(5):277-82; discussion 282. doi: 10.1016/s0008-4182(02)80022-9. Can J Ophthalmol. 2002. PMID: 12322859
-
Correlation Between the Dynamic Postoperative Visual Outcome and the Restoration of Foveal Microstructures After Macular Hole Surgery.Am J Ophthalmol. 2015 Jul;160(1):100-6.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.03.019. Epub 2015 Mar 27. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015. PMID: 25817009
-
Outcome results in macular hole surgery: an evaluation of internal limiting membrane peeling with and without indocyanine green.Ophthalmology. 2003 Sep;110(9):1697-701. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00562-1. Ophthalmology. 2003. PMID: 13129864
-
FIRST FAILED MACULAR HOLE SURGERY OR REOPENING OF A PREVIOUSLY CLOSED HOLE: Do We Gain by Reoperating?-A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Retina. 2020 Jan;40(1):1-15. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002564. Retina. 2020. PMID: 31335482 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Idiopathic Epiretinal Membrane Surgery in Patients Aged Over 80 Years: Efficacy and Safety.Clin Ophthalmol. 2023 Nov 3;17:3365-3372. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S437815. eCollection 2023. Clin Ophthalmol. 2023. PMID: 37941775 Free PMC article.
-
Optical Coherence Tomography based indices in predicting functional outcome of macular hole surgery: A retrospective chart review.Pak J Med Sci. 2021 Sep-Oct;37(5):1504-1508. doi: 10.12669/pjms.37.5.4126. Pak J Med Sci. 2021. PMID: 34475938 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous