Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Sep;53(3):207-212.
doi: 10.15644/asc53/3/2.

The Influence of the Extent of Color-Vision Deficiency on Shade-Matching Ability

Affiliations

The Influence of the Extent of Color-Vision Deficiency on Shade-Matching Ability

Boštjan Pohlen et al. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2019 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the influence of the extent of color-vision deficiency on visual shade-matching ability.

Materials and methods: Six groups were investigated: the control group (N = 68), the protan medium deficiency (PMED) group (N = 5), the protan strong deficiency (PSTD) group (N = 5), the deutan mild deficiency (DMID) group (N = 5), the deutan medium deficiency (DMED) group (N = 5) and the deutan strong deficiency (DSTD) group (N = 8). The color vision of the participants was evaluated monocularly using the Hardy-Rand-Rittler (HRR) test and on an HMC Anomaloskop MR (Rayleigh test). The final exam on a Toothguide Training Box consisted of 15 lightness-chroma-hue tasks. The color difference (∆E*ab) and the shade-matching score (Σ∆E*ab) were computed. The means and the standard deviations for the Σ∆E*ab were calculated. An independent t-test was used for statistical analyses of the data and a comparison of means (α = .05) for protan groups and a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and a post-hoc Bonferroni test (α = .05) for deutan groups.

Results: The PSTD group had a mean Σ∆E*ab of 63.38 ± 9.52, which means their selections were significantly worse in comparison to the PMED group (Σ∆E*ab = 47.62 ± 9.88, p = 0.033). The selections of the control group were significantly better in comparison to all groups with color-vision deficiency (control - PMED, p = 0.031; control - PSTD, p < 0.0001; control - DMED, p < 0.0001; control - DSTD, p < 0.0001), except in comparison with DMID group (p = 0.082). The comparisons between deutan groups were not significantly different (DMID - DMED, p = 0.352; DMID - DSTD, p = 0.323; DMED - DSTD, p = 1.000).

Conclusion: Participants with strong protan color-vision deficiency are worse at shade matching than participants with medium protan color-vision deficiency.

Keywords: Color-Vision Deficiency; Extent; Hardy-Rand-Rittler (HRR) test, Toothguide Training Box (TTB); Shade Matching.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interests: All authors disclose any financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that could inappropriately influence (bias) our work. None declared

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Σ∆E*ab for the final exam on the TTB.

References

    1. Horn DJ, Bulan-Brady J, Hicks ML. Sphere spectrophotometer versus human evaluation of tooth shade. J Endod. 1998. Dec;24(12):786–90. 10.1016/S0099-2399(98)80002-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gokce HS, Ceyhan D, Piskin B, Gokce SM, Arisan V. Shade matching performance of normal and color vision-deficient dental professionals with standard daylight and tungsten illuminants. J Prosthet Dent. 2010. Mar;103(3):139–47. 10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60020-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pohlen B, Hawlina M, Tekavcic Pompe M, Kopac I. Do Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus and Color-Vision Deficiencies Influence Shade-Matching Ability? Int J Prosthodont. 2018. May/Jun;31(3):239–47. 10.11607/ijp.5563 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Neitz J, Bailey JE. - editors. Pseudoisochromatic plates. 4th ed. Boca Raton: Richmond Products; 2002.
    1. Kroszewsky K, Jakstat HA. Learning an teaching color-taking. Deut Zahnärztl Z. 2004;59:593–5.

LinkOut - more resources