Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Sep;53(3):213-246.
doi: 10.15644/asc53/3/5.

Root and Root Canal Morphology Differences Between Genders: A Comprehensive in-vivo CBCT Study in a Saudi Population

Affiliations

Root and Root Canal Morphology Differences Between Genders: A Comprehensive in-vivo CBCT Study in a Saudi Population

Mohammed Mashyakhy et al. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2019 Sep.

Abstract

Objectives: To comprehensively explore the differences of all maxillary and mandibular permanent teeth in relation to number of roots, number of root canals, and root canal configuration between both genders in a Saudi Arabian population.

Methods: This retrospective radiographic study comprised 208 subjects (48% males and 52% females) with a mean age 28.74±9.56 years. The CBCT images of the recruited subjects were evaluated for all permanent teeth. A careful examination was obtained by optimal visualization using all the software features. The data were analyzed using SPSS software program. Cohen's Kappa test was used for reliability and the Chi-squared test of association was used for the differences between both genders in relation to the study variables. A P-value < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results: A total of 5254 maxillary and mandibular permanent teeth were evaluated. In relation to number of roots, there were no significant differences between both genders for all maxillary and mandibular teeth together (P= 0.064) as well as for maxillary and mandibular teeth separately (P= 0.315 and P= 0.100, respectively). A significant difference was found between males and females in relation to the number of canals of maxillary teeth (P= 0.014). For mandibular teeth, the significant level of difference was at the cut-off point (P= 0.050). For all maxillary and mandibular teeth together, the distribution among both genders was not significant (P= 0.082). The difference between both genders with regard to canal configuration of maxillary roots was highly statistically significant (P< 0.001). For mandibular teeth, the difference between males and females in relation canal configuration of anterior and premolar teeth was significant (P= 0.016) while, the difference was not significant when related to mesial roots of 1st and 2nd molars (P= 0.205). However, the difference was highly significant when related to distal roots of 1st and 2nd molars (P< 0.001).

Conclusion: No significant differences between both genders in relation to number of roots were found. Regarding the number of canals, significant differences were found only in three groups out of 14 groups of teeth with females who had a smaller number of canals than males. For canal configuration, two groups of maxillary teeth and three groups of mandibular teeth showed statistically significant differences between both genders.

Keywords: CBCT; Dental Anatomy; Gender; Morphology; Saudi Population.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: None declared

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CBCT axial sections showing maxillary (a) and mandibular (b) anterior and premolar teeth with one canal and Vertucci Type I
Figure 2
Figure 2
CBCT axial sections showing maxillary molars with 4 canals and premolars with 2 canals (a); and mandibular molars with 3 canals and premolars with 2 canals (b)
Figure 3
Figure 3
CBCT images showing sagittal sections (a) of mandibular central incisors with 2 canals and Vertucci type III; and coronal sections (b) of mandibular first premolar with 2 canals and Vertucci type V.
Figure 4
Figure 4
CBCT coronal sections showing different Vertucci types in maxillary premolars; Type II (a), Type IV (b), Type III (c), Type V (d).

References

    1. Goyal G, Singh R, Bansal N, Paliwal VK. Anatomical Variations of Cerebral MR Venography: Is Gender Matter? Neurointervention. 2016. Sep;11(2):92–8. 10.5469/neuroint.2016.11.2.92 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Clayton JA. Sex influences in neurological disorders: case studies and perspectives. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2016. Dec;18(4):357–60. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fan H, Zhao G, Ren D, Liu F, Dong G, Hou Y. Gender differences of B cell signature related to estrogen-induced IFI44L/BAFF in systemic lupus erythematosus. Immunol Lett. 2017. Jan;181:71–8. 10.1016/j.imlet.2016.12.002 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zissimopoulos JM, Barthold D, Brinton RD, Joyce G. Sex and Race Differences in the Association Between Statin Use and the Incidence of Alzheimer Disease. JAMA Neurol. 2017. Feb 1;74(2):225–32. 10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.3783 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brar A, Markell M. Impact of gender and gender disparities in patients with kidney disease. Curr Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2019. Mar;28(2):178–82. 10.1097/MNH.0000000000000482 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources