Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Dec;71(4):512-516.
doi: 10.1007/s12070-019-01690-2. Epub 2019 Jun 19.

Three Dimensional Rhinoplasty and Nasal Airway Improvement in Cleft-Nose Deformity

Affiliations

Three Dimensional Rhinoplasty and Nasal Airway Improvement in Cleft-Nose Deformity

John Oommen et al. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Dec.

Abstract

Septorhinoplasty is particularly challenging among revision surgeries for cleft sequelae. The challenge of cleft septorhinoplasty is mainly due to the complex anatomy of nose, deformity of each of its components and the difficulty and lack of clarity in surgical management. From 2014 to 2017, 26 patients with cleft lip nose deformity were operated by the same cleft team. The study was conducted to assess the improvement in nasal airway and appearance following secondary rhinoplasty with extracorporeal septoplasty. Post operatively each patient was evaluated using the standard modified rhinoplasty outcome evaluation questionnaire, a validated instrument that aids in stratifying patients according to their subjective response. All patients reported great relief of nasal obstruction and improved breathing. More than 80% of our patients were satisfied with improved aesthetics and reported better self-confidence. Secondary cleft rhinoplasty with extracorporeal septoplasty surgery significantly improves the cosmesis and nasal airway opening, subsequently giving them improved self-confidence.

Keywords: Cleft rhinoplasty; Congenital cleft deformity; Extracorporeal septoplasty; Functional nasal airway; Rhinoplasty outcome evaluation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interestThe authors declare that they have no conflict of interest and there was no funding or grants involved.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Comparison of pre-op and post-op total mean scores based on rhinoplasty outcome evaluation (ROE) questionnaire results. Similar comparison for unilateral and bilateral subgroups is also shown
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Comparison of difference in scores for individual questions of rhinoplasty outcome evaluation (ROE) questionnaire. Difference in score = post-op score − pre-op score (x axis—questions, y axis—mean scores of each question)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Photographs showing the surgical results of two representative patients

References

    1. Gubisch W. Twenty-five years’ experience with extracorporeal septoplasty. Fac Plast Surg. 2006;22(4):230–239. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-954841. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wang Z, Wang P, Zhang Y, Shen G. Nasal airway evaluation after Le Fort I osteotomy combined with septoplasty in patients with cleft lip and palate. J Craniofac Surg. 2017;28(1):207–211. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003259. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Parrilla C, Artuso A, Gallus R, Galli J, Paludetti G. The role of septal surgery in cosmetic rhinoplasty. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2013;33(3):146–153. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alsarraf R, Larrabee WF, Jr, Anderson S, Murakami CS, Johnson CM., Jr Measuring cosmetic facial plastic surgery outcomes: a pilot study. Arch Fac Plast Surg. 2001;3(3):198–201. doi: 10.1001/archfaci.3.3.198. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sawyer AR, Robinson S, Cadier M. Prospective patient—related outcome evaluation of secondary cleft rhinoplasty using a validated questionnaire. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2017;54(4):436–441. doi: 10.1597/14-168. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources