Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Nov 21;14(11):e0223809.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223809. eCollection 2019.

Direct transport vs secondary transfer to level I trauma centers in a French exclusive trauma system: Impact on mortality and determinants of triage on road-traffic victims

Affiliations

Direct transport vs secondary transfer to level I trauma centers in a French exclusive trauma system: Impact on mortality and determinants of triage on road-traffic victims

Sophie Rym Hamada et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Transporting a severely injured patient directly to a trauma center (TC) is consensually considered optimal. Nevertheless, disagreement persists regarding the association between secondary transfer status and outcome. The aim of the study was to compare adjusted mortality between road traffic trauma patients directly or secondarily transported to a level 1 trauma center (TC) in an exclusive French trauma system with a physician staffed prehospital emergency medical system (EMS).

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed using 2015-2017 data from a regional trauma registry (Traumabase®), an administrative database on road-traffic accidents and prehospital-EMS records. Multivariate logistic regression models were computed to determine the role of the modality of admission on mortality and to identify factors associated with secondary transfer. The primary outcome was day-30 mortality. Results: During the study period, 121.955 victims of road-traffic accident were recorded among which 4412 trauma patients were admitted in the level 1 regional TCs, 4031 directly and 381 secondarily transferred from lower levels facilities. No significant association between all-cause 30-day mortality and the type of transport was observed (Odds ratio 0.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.3-1.9]) when adjusted for potential confounders. Patients secondarily transferred were older, with low-energy mechanism and presented higher head and abdominal injury scores. Among all 947 death, 43 (4.5%) occurred in lower-level facilities. The population-based undertriage leading to death was 0.15%, 95%CI [0.12-0.19].

Conclusion: In an exclusive trauma system with physician staffed prehospital care, road-traffic victims secondarily transferred to a TC do not have an increased mortality when compared to directly transported patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Map of the region Île-de-France with trauma center, SAMU dispatch center and ambulance stations location.
The Île de France region gathers 8 central emergency medical system dispatch centers (SAMU- Service d’Aide Médicale Urgente), 43 prehospital enhanced mobile care team stations (SMUR- Service Mobile d’Urgence et de Réanimation) and 6 level 1 Trauma Centers (TCs). The region is organized as an exclusive trauma system, conceiving severe trauma care only in the 6 designated TC among all existing tertiary care facilities (n = 87).
Fig 2
Fig 2. Flow charts of the study.
Green filling: Traumabase data. Black boxes: RAAR and Traumabase linkage to identifiy the place of death of patients dead outside the trauma centre. Blue filling: Data extracted from SAMU archives. Pie: Population of hospital admissions extracted from RAAR, Traumabase and SAMU archives joint analysis

References

    1. Hay SI, Abajobir AA, Abate KH, Abbafati C, Abbas KM, Abd-Allah F, et al. Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 333 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. The Lancet. 2017;390: 1260–1344. 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32130-X - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. MacKenzie EJ, Rivara FP, Jurkovich GJ, Nathens AB, Frey KP, Egleston BL, et al. A national evaluation of the effect of trauma-center care on mortality. N Engl J Med. 2006;354: 366–378. 10.1056/NEJMsa052049 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eastman AB, Mackenzie EJ, Nathens AB. Sustaining a coordinated, regional approach to trauma and emergency care is critical to patient health care needs. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013;32: 2091–2098. 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0716 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jenkins P, Rogers J, Kehoe A, Smith JE. An evaluation of the use of a two-tiered trauma team activation system in a UK major trauma centre. Emerg Med J. 2015;32: 364–367. 10.1136/emermed-2013-203402 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cole E, Lecky F, West A, Smith N, Brohi K, Davenport R. The Impact of a Pan-regional Inclusive Trauma System on Quality of Care: Annals of Surgery. 2016;264: 188–194. 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001393 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types