Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Nov 19;16(22):4577.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph16224577.

Diverged Preferences towards Sustainable Development Goals? A Comparison between Academia and the Communication Industry

Affiliations
Review

Diverged Preferences towards Sustainable Development Goals? A Comparison between Academia and the Communication Industry

Shin-Cheng Yeh et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

To understand how the sustainable development goals (SDGs) are involved and cited in different fields, the current study aimed to explore the key SDGs and SDG-pairs from the viewpoints of academia and the media. The academic publications with SDG(s)-related keywords in the Scopus database and the entry videos of the "2018 SDG Lions" were collected and analyzed through content and network analysis. It was found that SDG 3 and SDG 10 shared the highest preferences in both industries, but apparent gaps happened to SDG 5. The tied frequencies of the possible SDG pairs were also examined, and SDG 3-10 was identified taking the lead in both industries. Network analysis using degree centrality as the vital parameter demonstrated that SDG 8 and SDG 5 has strong connections with several SDGs for the academia and the media, respectively. The SDG-2-6-7 combination or "water-energy-food" nexus was also found the most frequent combination of three SDGs in the academia. Overall, SDG 3 can be treated as a unifying theme when seeking to acquire evidence-based knowledge for integrated implementation of the SDGs. Important implications for policy-making of the SDGs were also discussed.

Keywords: academic publications; health and well-being; inequality; sustainable development goals (SDGs); the media industry.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The flow diagram of the present systematic review study.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The number of academic references for each SDG in each year (upper) and the sum from 2015 to 2018 (lower).
Figure 3
Figure 3
The proportion of each SDG’s entries (blue bars and numbers) to shortlists (orange line and numbers) in 2018 SDG Lions.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The comparison of academic (left bar) with communication (right bar) industries about the relevance percentage of the top 10 SDGs in 2018.
Figure 5
Figure 5
The elaborate network graph of 17 SDGs (generated using UCINET).
Figure 6
Figure 6
The network graph is showing SDGs and connections with higher tied frequencies of the academic publications (a) and media videos (b) of SDG-related topics from 2015 to 2018, bigger icons and thicker linkages indicating higher total frequencies of SDG and higher tied frequencies between two SDGs, respectively.
Figure 7
Figure 7
The comparison of academic (black frame) with communication (filled colored grids) industries on the tied frequency of SDG 3 and other SDGs in 2018.
Figure 8
Figure 8
The conceptual location of references related to SDGs and water-energy-food nexus (please see Table 5 for the meaning of the number).

References

    1. Le Blanc D. Towards integration at last? The sustainable development goals as a network of targets. Sustain. Dev. 2015;23:176–187. doi: 10.1002/sd.1582. - DOI
    1. Sustainable Development Goals Knowledge Platform United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) Earth Summit. [(accessed on 1 October 2018)]; Available online: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/milestones/unced.
    1. Gore C. The post-2015 moment: Towards sustainable development goals and a new global development paradigm. J. Int. Dev. (DSA Conf. Spec. Issue) 2015;27:717–732. doi: 10.1002/jid.3109. - DOI
    1. Future Earth. [(accessed on 1 May 2019)]; Available online: http://futureearth.org/sites/default/files/2016_report_contribution_ sci....
    1. Pradhan P., Costa L., Rybski D., Lucht W., Kropp J. A systematic study of sustainable development goal (SDG) interactions. Earth’s Future. 2017;5:1169–1179. doi: 10.1002/2017EF000632. - DOI