Endometrial Cancer Stem Cells: Role, Characterization and Therapeutic Implications
- PMID: 31752447
- PMCID: PMC6896186
- DOI: 10.3390/cancers11111820
Endometrial Cancer Stem Cells: Role, Characterization and Therapeutic Implications
Abstract
Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most frequent gynecological cancer. In patients with relapsed and advanced disease, prognosis is still dismal and development of resistance is common. In this context, endometrial Cancer Stem Cells (eCSC), stem-like cells capable to self-renewal and differentiation in mature cancer cells, represent a potential field of expansion for drug development. The aim of this review is to characterize the role of eCSC in EC, their features and how they could be targeted. CSC are involved in progression, invasiveness and metastasis (though epithelial to mesenchimal transition, EMT), as well as chemoresistance in EC. Nevertheless, isolation of eCSC is still controversial. Indeed, CD133, Aldheyde dehydrogenase (ALDH), CD117, CD55 and CD44 are enriched in CSCs but there is no universal marker nowadays. The most frequently activated pathways in eCSC are Wingless-INT (Wnt)/β-catenin, Notch1, and Hedghog, with a high expression of self-renewal transcription factors like Octamer binding transcription factor 4 (OCT), B Lymphoma Mo-MLV Insertion Region 1 Homolog (BMI1), North American Network Operations Group Homebox protein (NANOG), and SRY-Box 2 (SOX2). These pathways have been targeted with selective drugs alone or in combination with chemotherapy and immunotherapy. Unfortunately, although preclinical results are encouraging, few clinical data are available.
Keywords: Cancer stem cell; endometrial cancer; target therapy.
Conflict of interest statement
Giannone reports grants from Roche, outside the submitted work. Attademo, Scotto, Genta, Ghisoni, Tuninetti have nothing to disclose. Aglietta reports travel grant from Merck, Tesaro and BMS, has been part of advisory board of Bayer, Novartis, BMS and Merck, received funding from Astrazeneca and Pharmamar, all outside the submitted work. Pignata reports honoraria from AstraZeneca, Tesaro Clovis, Roche, Pharmamar, MSD, Pfizer and Research funding from AstraZeneca, MSD, Roche Pfizer outside the submitted work. Valabrega reports speaking honoraria from AstraZeneca, Tesaro, Roche, Amgen, PharmaMar and has been part of advisory boards of Tesaro, Amgen and PharmaMar, outside the submitted work.
Figures
References
-
- Cancer Stat Facts: Uterine Cancer. [(accessed on 28 September 2019)]; Available online: https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/corp.html.
-
- Braun M.M., Overbeek-Wager E.A., Grumbo R.J. Diagnosis and Management of Endometrial Cancer. Am. Fam. Physician. 2016;93:468–474. - PubMed
-
- Lu K.H., Schorge J.O., Rodabaugh K.J., Daniels M.S., Sun C.C., Soliman P.T., White K.G., Luthra R., Gershenson D.M., Broaddus R.R. Prospective determination of prevalence of lynch syndrome in young women with endometrial cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2007;25:5158–5164. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.10.8597. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous