Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Nov 21;20(1):891.
doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-6249-1.

Genome wide association study reveals novel QTL for barley yellow dwarf virus resistance in wheat

Affiliations

Genome wide association study reveals novel QTL for barley yellow dwarf virus resistance in wheat

Shormin Choudhury et al. BMC Genomics. .

Abstract

Background: Barley yellow dwarf (BYD) is an important virus disease that causes significant reductions in wheat yield. For effective control of Barley yellow dwarf virus through breeding, the identification of genetic sources of resistance is key to success. In this study, 335 geographically diverse wheat accessions genotyped using an Illumina iSelect 90 K single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) bead chip array were used to identify new sources of resistance to BYD in different environments.

Results: A genome-wide association study (GWAS) performed using all the generalised and mixed linkage models (GLM and MLM, respectively) identified a total of 36 significant marker-trait associations, four of which were consistently detected in the K model. These four novel quantitative trait loci (QTL) were identified on chromosomes 2A, 2B, 6A and 7A and associated with markers IWA3520, IWB24938, WB69770 and IWB57703, respectively. These four QTL showed an additive effect with the average visual symptom score of the lines containing resistance alleles of all four QTL being much lower than those with less favorable alleles. Several Chinese landraces, such as H-205 (Baimazha) and H-014 (Dahongmai) which have all four favorable alleles, showed consistently higher resistance in different field trials. None of them contained the previously described Bdv2, Bdv3 or Bdv4 genes for BYD resistance.

Conclusions: This study identified multiple novel QTL for BYD resistance and some resistant wheat genotypes. These will be useful for breeders to generate combinations with and/or without Bdv2 to achieve higher levels and more stable BYD resistance.

Keywords: BYD resistance; Genome-wide association study; Novel QTL; SNP; Wheat.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
An estimation of the most probable number of clusters (K), based on 20 independent runs and K ranging from 2 to 8
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Population structure of the 335 wheat accessions. Three subpopulations (K = 3) were produced on genetic diversity detected by 4560 SNP markers, each are presented by a different colour
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Manhattan plots and Quantile-quantile (Q-Q) plots for genome wide association study (GWAS) of BYD resistance in 335 wheat accessions. a Manhattan plot in Q method; b Manhattan plot in K method; c Q-Q plot in K method. In Manhattan plots, significant association was identified using criterion of –log10 (P) > 3 (P < 0.001). Q-Q plots were displayed in marker–trait association analysis. The black line represents the expected line under the null distribution, while the red symbol in the observed –log10 (P) for BYD resistance
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Average symptom scores of genotypes with resistance alleles. 0: without any tolerance alleles, 1–4: with 1–4 resistance alleles
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
BYD symptom severity scores in wheat. Score 0, whole plant without symptoms; score 1, few leaves showing discoloration; score 2, about 20% leaf area has discoloration; score 3, 40% leaf area shows yellowing; score 4, 60%, leaf area shows yellowing; score 5, most of plant affected (photos were taken from field trials of the current experimental)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Miller WA, Liu S, Beckett R. Barley yellow dwarf virus. Luteoviridae or Tombusviridae? Mol Plant Pathol. 2002;3:177–183. doi: 10.1046/j.1364-3703.2002.00112.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lister RM, Ranieri R, D’Arcy CJ. Distribution and economic importance of barley yellow dwarf. In: Burnett PA, editor. Barley yellow dwarf: 40 years of progress. St Paul: APS Press; 1995. pp. 29–53.
    1. Kaddachi I, Souiden Y, Achouri D, Chéour F. Barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV): characteristics, hosts, vectors, disease symptoms and diagnosis. Int J phytopathol. 2014;3(3):155–160.
    1. Banks P, Larkin P, Bariana H, Lagudah E, Appels R, Waterhouse PM, Brettell R, Chen X, Xu H, Xin Z. The use of cell culture for subchromosomal introgressions of barley yellow dwarf virus resistance from Thinopyrum intermedium to wheat. Genome. 1995;38:395–405. doi: 10.1139/g95-051. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ordon F, Friedt W, Scheurer K, Pellio B, Werner K, Neuhaus G, Huth W, Habekuss A, Graner A. Molecular markers in breeding for virus resistance in barley. J Appl Genet. 2004;45:145–160. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources