Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Nov 21;17(1):90.
doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0490-6.

Organisational factors that facilitate research use in public health policy-making: a scoping review

Affiliations

Organisational factors that facilitate research use in public health policy-making: a scoping review

Mette Winge Jakobsen et al. Health Res Policy Syst. .

Abstract

Background: Although important syntheses and theoretical works exist in relation to understanding the organisational factors that facilitate research use, these contributions differ in their scope and object of study as well as their theoretical underpinnings. Therefore, from an exploratory angle, it may be useful to map out the current literature on organisational factors of research use in public health policy-making when revisiting existing theories and frameworks to gain further theoretical insights.

Methods: Herein, a scoping review technique and thematic content analysis were used to bring together findings from both synthesised and empirical studies of different types to map out the organisational factors that facilitate research use in public health policy-making.

Results: A total of 14 reviews and 40 empirical studies were included in the analysis. These were thematically coded and the intra-organisational factors reported as enabling research use were examined. Five main categories of organisational factors that advance research use in policy organisations - (1) individual factors, (2) the management of research integration, (3) organisational systems and infrastructures of research use, (4) institutional structures and rules for policy-making, and (5) organisational characteristics - were derived as well as 18 subcategories and a total of 64 specific factors, where 27 factors were well supported by research.

Conclusions: Using a scoping review methodology, the intra-organisational factors influencing research use in policy-making (including individual factors) were systematically mapped and the theories applied in this area of research were assessed. The review findings confirm the importance of an intra-organisational perspective when exploring research use, showing that many organisational factors are critical facilitators of research use but also that many factors and mechanisms are understudied. The synthesis shows a lack of studies on politicians and the need for more theoretically founded research. Despite increased efforts to update the existing evidential and theoretical basis of research use, we still need frameworks that combine different approaches and theories to help us grasp the complex organisational mechanisms that facilitate research use in policy settings.

Keywords: Research utilisation; evidence-based policy; health policy; individual research capacity; knowledge translation; organisational research capacity; organisational research use; scoping study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Review search strategy. Flow chart of the search strategy and the selection process for identifying studies reporting or synthesising empirical findings on organisational factors facilitating research use in public health policy-making
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Study design characteristics and targeted policy area of included study. The graph shows the variation of the targeted policy areas for study design characteristic. Most noticeably is the large representation of studies conducted in the population health area, especially case studies, and the scares contribution of studies coming from the built environment and mental health areas
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Concept map of organisational factors that facilitate research use including highly supported factors. The overall categories are displayed as squares, subcategories as squares with soft edges, and the detailed factors are displayed as circles. The sizes of the circles are without importance. The circles with bold text and thick boundaries present the factors, which are supported by seven or more studies including at least one review. The figure shows that 27 out of 64 identified factors are highly supported by research, primarily within the overall categories of individual factors, management of research integration and organisational systems and infrastructure for research use

References

    1. Hamalainen RM, Aro AR, van de Goor I, Lau CJ, Jakobsen MW, Chereches RM, Syed AM, the REPOPA Consortium Exploring the use of research evidence in health-enhancing physical activity policies. Health Res Policy Sys. 2015;13:43. doi: 10.1186/s12961-015-0047-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zardo P, Collie A. Type, frequency and purpose of information used to inform public health policy and program decision-making. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:381. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1581-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bowen S, Erickson T, Martens PJ, Crockett S. More than “using research”: the real challenges in promoting evidence-informed decision-making. Health Policy. 2009;4:87–102. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bowen S, Zwi AB. Pathways to “evidence-informed” policy and practice: a framework for action. PLoS Med. 2005;2:600–605. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020166. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brownson RC, Fielding JE, Maylahn CM. Evidence-based public health: a fundamental concept for public health practice. Annu Rev Public Health. 2009;30:175–201. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.031308.100134. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources