Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Nov;5(11):1331-1341.
doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2019.07.016. Epub 2019 Oct 2.

Development and Validation of a Prediction Model for Atrial Fibrillation Using Electronic Health Records

Affiliations

Development and Validation of a Prediction Model for Atrial Fibrillation Using Electronic Health Records

Olivia L Hulme et al. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2019 Nov.

Abstract

Objectives: This study sought to determine whether the risk of atrial fibrillation AF can be estimated accurately by using routinely ascertained features in the electronic health record (EHR) and whether AF risk is associated with stroke.

Background: Early diagnosis of AF and treatment with anticoagulation may prevent strokes.

Methods: Using a multi-institutional EHR, this study identified 412,085 individuals 45 to 95 years of age without prevalent AF between 2000 and 2014. A prediction model was derived and validated for 5-year AF risk by using split-sample validation and model performance was compared with other methods of AF risk assessment.

Results: Within 5 years, 14,334 individuals developed AF. In the derivation sample (7,216 AF events of 206,042 total), the optimal risk model included sex, age, race, smoking, height, weight, diastolic blood pressure, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, heart failure, coronary heart disease, valvular disease, prior stroke, peripheral arterial disease, chronic kidney disease, hypothyroidism, and quadratic terms for height, weight, and age. In the validation sample (7,118 AF events of 206,043 total) the AF risk model demonstrated good discrimination (C-statistic: 0.777; 95% confidence interval [CI:] 0.771 to 0.783) and calibration (0.99; 95% CI: 0.96 to 1.01). Model discrimination and calibration were superior to CHARGE-AF (Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genomic Epidemiology AF) (C-statistic: 0.753; 95% CI: 0.747 to 0.759; calibration slope: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.71 to 0.74), C2HEST (Coronary artery disease / chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; Hypertension; Elderly [age ≥75 years]; Systolic heart failure; Thyroid disease [hyperthyroidism]) (C-statistic: 0.754; 95% CI: 0.747 to 0.762; calibration slope: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.43 to 0.45), and CHA2DS2-VASc (Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age ≥75 years, Diabetes mellitus, Prior stroke, transient ischemic attack [TIA], or thromboembolism, Vascular disease, Age 65-74 years, Sex category [female]) scores (C-statistic: 0.702; 95% CI: 0.693 to 0.710; calibration slope: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.36 to 0.38). AF risk discriminated incident stroke (n = 4,814; C-statistic: 0.684; 95% CI: 0.677 to 0.692) and stroke within 90 days of incident AF (n = 327; C-statistic: 0.789; 95% CI: 0.764 to 0.814).

Conclusions: A model developed from a real-world EHR database predicted AF accurately and stratified stroke risk. Incorporating AF prediction into EHRs may enable risk-guided screening for AF.

Keywords: atrial fibrillation; electronic health record; risk prediction; stroke.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Flow diagram depicting patient inclusion.
AF = atrial fibrillation.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Discrimination and calibration of scoring systems for predicting incident atrial fibrillation.
Panel A displays the C-statistic point estimate and 95% confidence interval for each of the three prediction models compared for predicting incident atrial fibrillation. Panels B-E display the predicted (x-axis) versus observed (y-axis) probability of incident atrial fibrillation for the EHR-derived score, CHARGE-AF score, C2HEST, and CHA2DS2-VASc scores, respectively. For Panels B-E, the histograms represent the distribution of five-year predicted risk of atrial fibrillation. Perfect calibration is represented by the gray diagonal line through the origin. The black line corresponds to the observed calibration, and the orange line to the optimism-corrected calibration. Calibration slopes (and 95% confidence intervals) are depicted on the graphs. Calibration plots generated using the rms package (33). CHARGE-AF = Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genomic Epidemiology Atrial Fibrillation; EHR = electronic health record.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Cumulative incidence of atrial fibrillation and stroke stratified by five-year predicted risk of atrial fibrillation using EHR-derived score.
Cumulative incidence of A) atrial fibrillation, B) stroke, and C) stroke within 90 days of an atrial fibrillation diagnosis, stratified by five-year predicted risk of atrial fibrillation. Panel A includes all 206,043 individuals from the validation set, while panels B and C include 198,300 individuals without prevalent stroke.
Central Illustration.
Central Illustration.. Observed event rates stratified by predicted five-year risk.
Observed five-year incidence of atrial fibrillation, stroke, and stroke within 90 days of an atrial fibrillation diagnosis, stratified by percentage point increase in five-year predicted risk of atrial fibrillation. Five-year predicted risk of atrial fibrillation was rounded to the nearest whole number. Perfect correlation between predicted and observed atrial fibrillation incidence is represented by the gray line. Point estimates indicate observed five-year event risk, and bars represent 95% confidence intervals.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Miyasaka Y, Barnes ME, Gersh BJ et al. Secular trends in incidence of atrial fibrillation in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1980 to 2000, and implications on the projections for future prevalence. Circulation 2006;114:119–25. - PubMed
    1. Wolf PA, Abbott RD, Kannel WB. Atrial fibrillation as an independent risk factor for stroke: the Framingham Study. Stroke 1991;22:983–8. - PubMed
    1. Petty GW, Brown RD Jr., Whisnant JP, Sicks JD, O’Fallon WM, Wiebers DO. Ischemic stroke subtypes : a population-based study of functional outcome, survival, and recurrence. Stroke 2000;31:1062–8. - PubMed
    1. Lamassa M, Di Carlo A, Pracucci G et al. Characteristics, outcome, and care of stroke associated with atrial fibrillation in Europe: data from a multicenter multinational hospital-based registry (The European Community Stroke Project). Stroke 2001;32:392–8. - PubMed
    1. Marini C, De Santis F, Sacco S et al. Contribution of atrial fibrillation to incidence and outcome of ischemic stroke: results from a population-based study. Stroke 2005;36:1115–9. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms