Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Mar 19;22(1):1285.
doi: 10.4102/sajr.v22i1.1285. eCollection 2018.

Interventionalists' perceptions on a culture of radiation protection

Affiliations

Interventionalists' perceptions on a culture of radiation protection

André Rose et al. SA J Radiol. .

Abstract

Background: Occupational exposure to ionising radiation poses potential health risks to radiation workers unless adequate protection is in place. The catheterisation laboratory is a highly contextualised workplace with a distinctive organisational and workplace culture.

Objective: This study was conducted to understand the culture of radiation protection (CRP).

Methods: This study was a qualitative study and data were collected through 30 in-depth and 6 group interviews with 54 purposively selected South African interventionalists (interventional radiologists and cardiologists). The participants included a diversity of interventionalists who varied in sex, geographic location and years of experience with fluoroscopy. The transcribed data were analysed thematically using a deductive and inductive approach.

Results: 'Culture of radiation protection' emerged as a complex theme that intersected with other themes: 'knowledge and awareness of radiation', 'radiation safety practice', 'personal protective equipment (PPE) utilisation' and 'education and training'.

Conclusion: Establishing and sustaining a CRP provides an opportunity to mitigate the potentially detrimental health effects of occupational radiation exposure. Education and training are pivotal to establishing a CRP. The time to establish a culture of radiation in the catheterisation laboratory is now.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no financial or personal relationship(s) which may have inappropriately influenced them in writing this article.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bhargavan M. Trends in the utilization of medical procedures that use ionizing radiation. Health Phys. 2008;95:612–627. 10.1097/01.HP.0000327659.42618.c1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Le Heron J, Padovani R, Smith I, Czarwinski R. Radiation protection of medical staff. Eur J Radiol. 2010;76:20–23. 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.06.034 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ciraj-Bjelac O, Rehani MM, Sim KH, Liew HB, Vano E, Kleiman NJ. Risk for radiation-induced cataract for staff in interventional cardiology: Is there reason for concern? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;76:826–834. 10.1002/ccd.22670 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andreassi MG, Piccaluga E, Guagliumi G, Del Greco M, Gaita F, Picano E. Occupational health risks in cardiac catheterization laboratory workers. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9:1–9. - PubMed
    1. Brown KR, Rzucidlo E. Acute and chronic radiation injury. J Vasc Surg. 2011;53:15S–21S. 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.06.175 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources