Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Oct 31;22(2):1370.
doi: 10.4102/sajr.v22i2.1370. eCollection 2018.

Screening mammography with special reference to guidelines in South Africa

Affiliations
Review

Screening mammography with special reference to guidelines in South Africa

Shirley Lipschitz. SA J Radiol. .

Abstract

Screening mammography is known to reduce mortality from breast cancer. Controversy regarding screening has led to much confusion in the medical fraternity. The purpose of this review is to point out the 'pros and cons' of screening. The benefits and perceived harms of screening will be discussed using evidence-based literature from the past 30 years. The literature was obtained from various journals sourced from the Internet. General findings are that screening mammography from the age of 40 saves lives, but that the problem of overdiagnosis and overtreatment of certain breast cancers overrides the benefit of screening. The article also covers the debate on what age to begin screening. Screening in the South African context is discussed. Screening in the future will need to be more selective of patients and of which cancers to treat less aggressively, if at all.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares that she has no financial or personal relationships that may have inappropriately influenced her in writing this article.

References

    1. Tabar L, Vitak B, Chen HH, et al. . The Swedish two-county trial twenty years later. Updated mortality results and new insights from long-term follow-up [In Process of Citation]. Radiol Clin North Am. 2000;38(4):625–651. 10.1016/S0033-8389(05)70191-3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Howlander N, Noone A, Krapcho M, et al. . SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2012. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2015.
    1. Shapiro S, Strax P, Venet L. Periodic breast cancer screening in reducing mortality from breast cancer. JAMA. 1971;215(11):1777–1785. 10.1001/jama.1971.03180240027005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Smith RA, Duffy SW, Gabe R, Tabar L, Yen AM, Chen TH. The randomized trials of breast cancer screening: What have we learned? Radiol Clin North Am. 2004;42(5):793–806. 10.1016/j.rcl.2004.06.014 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tabar L, Vitak B, Chen HH, et al. . Swedish two-county trial: Impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality during 3 decades. Radiology. 2011;260(3):658–663. 10.1148/radiol.11110469 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources