Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar;146(3):659-670.
doi: 10.1007/s00432-019-03086-9. Epub 2019 Nov 21.

Bevacizumab versus alkylating chemotherapy in recurrent glioblastoma

Affiliations

Bevacizumab versus alkylating chemotherapy in recurrent glioblastoma

Katharina Seystahl et al. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2020 Mar.

Abstract

Background: The use of alkylating chemotherapy versus bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma remains controversial. Here, we tested the hypothesis that the activity of alkylators, but not that of bevacizumab, would be associated with the O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status.

Methods: We analyzed a cohort of patients treated at centers of the German Glioma Network or the University Hospital Zurich with alkylating agent-based chemotherapy (n = 260) or bevacizumab without or with irinotecan (n = 84) for first recurrence of glioblastoma. Outcome was stratified for O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) status and crossover to bevacizumab or alkylators at further progression.

Results: Median post-recurrence survival-1 (PRS-1) for patients receiving alkylating agents at first recurrence was longer than with bevacizumab (11.1 versus 7.4 months, p < 0.001). The use of alkylators was associated with longer PRS-1 for patients with a methylated versus unmethylated MGMT promoter (p = 0.017). For patients receiving bevacizumab, PRS-1 was not different with or without MGMT promoter methylation. PRS-1 was longer in patients receiving alkylating chemotherapy compared to bevacizumab for patients with methylated (p < 0.001) or unmethylated MGMT promoter (p = 0.034). For patients with alkylators at first recurrence receiving bevacizumab at any further recurrence, PRS-1 was longer than in patients receiving bevacizumab first and alkylators thereafter (p = 0.002).

Conclusions: This study confirms limited value of bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma independent of MGMT status. Alkylating agents have activity in recurrent glioblastoma, especially in the context of MGMT promoter methylation.

Keywords: Bevacizumab; Chemotherapy; Glioblastoma; Nitrosourea; Temozolomide.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

KS has received honoraria for board participation from Roche. GR has received honoraria from advisory boards from Abbvie. UH reports grants and personal fees from Roche, personal fees and non-financial support from Medac, personal fees and non-financial support from Bristol-Myers Squibb, personal fees from Novocure, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Daichii-Sankyo, personal fees from Riemser, personal fees from Noxxon, personal fees from AbbVie, personal fees from Bayer. MiW has received research grants from Abbvie, Adastra, Dracen, Merck, Sharp & Dohme (MSD), Merck (EMD), Novocure, Piqur and Roche, and honoraria for lectures or advisory board participation or consulting from Abbvie, Basilea, Bristol Meyer Squibb (BMS), Celgene, Merck, Sharp & Dohme (MSD), Merck (EMD), Novocure, Orbus, Roche and Tocagen. The other authors report no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Outcome stratified for treatment at first recurrence. Outcome for the entire patient cohort (left) or the subgroup of patients with known IDH status and exclusion of patients with IDH-mutant tumors (right) treated with alkylating agents (blue curve) or bevacizumab alone or in combination with irinotecan (red curve) at first recurrence: Post-recurrence survival-1 (PRS-1) (a, b), progression-free survival from initial diagnosis (PFS-1) (c, d), overall survival (OS) from initial diagnosis (e, f), and median PFS-1 and median PRS-1 (g, h)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Outcome stratified by treatment and MGMT status. Outcome data for the entire patient cohort (left) or the subgroup of patients with known IDH status and exclusion of patients with IDH-mutant tumors (right) treated at first recurrence with either alkylating agents (blue curves) or bevacizumab (red curves) stratified for methylated (continuous line) or unmethylated (dashed line) MGMT promoter: post-recurrence survival-1 (PRS-1) (a, b), progression-free survival from initial diagnosis (PFS-1) (c, d), overall survival (OS) from initial diagnosis (e, f), and median PFS-1 and median PRS-1 (g, h)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Outcome stratified for further salvage therapies. Outcome data for the entire patient cohort (left) or the subgroup of patients with known IDH status and exclusion of patients with IDH-mutant tumors (right) treated at first recurrence with alkylating agents followed by a bevacizumab-containing regimen at any further recurrence (blue continuous line) or never received bevacizumab at any further salvage therapy (blue dashed line) or treated with a bevacizumab-containing regimen at first recurrence followed by treatment with alkylators at any further recurrence (red continuous line) or never receiving alkylators at any further salvage therapy (red dashed curve): post-recurrence survival-1 (PRS-1) (a, b), progression-free survival from initial diagnosis (PFS-1) (c, d), overall survival (OS) from initial diagnosis (e, f), median PFS-1 and median PRS-1 (g, h). In the subgroup of patients receiving further systemic therapy after second recurrence, median PFS-1, median time from initiation of systemic treatment for first recurrence until the initiation of any salvage therapy for second recurrence (PFS-2) and survival from systemic treatment for second recurrence to death (PRS-2) was also assessed (i, j)

References

    1. Batchelor TT et al (2013) Phase III randomized trial comparing the efficacy of cediranib as monotherapy, and in combination with lomustine, versus lomustine alone in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol 31:3212–3218. 10.1200/jco.2012.47.2464 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Clarke J et al (2017) Multicenter, Phase 1, dose escalation study of hypofractionated stereotactic radiation therapy with bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma and anaplastic astrocytoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 99:797–804. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.06.2466 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fleischmann DF et al (2019) Bevacizumab reduces toxicity of reirradiation in recurrent high-grade glioma. Radiother Oncol 138:99–105. 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.06.009 - PubMed
    1. Flieger M et al (2014) Re-irradiation and bevacizumab in recurrent high-grade glioma: an effective treatment option. J Neurooncol 117:337–345. 10.1007/s11060-014-1394-5 - PubMed
    1. Friedman HS et al (2009) Bevacizumab alone and in combination with irinotecan in recurrent glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol 27:4733–4740. 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.8721 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources