Souled out of rights? - predicaments in protecting the human spirit in the age of neuromarketing
- PMID: 31754881
- PMCID: PMC6873768
- DOI: 10.1186/s40504-019-0095-4
Souled out of rights? - predicaments in protecting the human spirit in the age of neuromarketing
Abstract
Modern neurotechnologies are rapidly infringing on conventional notions of human dignity and they are challenging what it means to be human. This article is a survey analysis of the future of the digital age, reflecting primarily on the effects of neurotechnology that violate universal human rights to dignity, self-determination, and privacy. In particular, this article focuses on neuromarketing to critically assess potentially negative social ramifications of under-regulated neurotechnological application. Possible solutions are critically evaluated, including the human rights claim to the 'right to mental privacy' and the suggestion of a new human right based on spiritual jurisdiction, where the human psyche is a legal space in a substantive legal setting.
Keywords: Human dignity; Human rights; Human spirit; Legal theory; Mental privacy; Neuromarketing; Surveillance.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
-
- Benjamin W. Zur kritik der gewalt und andere aufsätze. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag; 1921.
-
- Brown, Wendy. 2015. Undoing the demos: Neoliberalism’s stealth revolution. Brooklyn: Zone Books.
-
- Burchell D. Civic personae: MacIntyre, cicero and morality. History of Political Thought. 1998;19:101–118.
-
- Dean M. Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society, second edition. Washington: Sage; 2010.
-
- Douzinas C. Human rights and empire: The political philosophy of cosmopolitanism. London: Routledge-Cavendish; 2007.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
