Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jan:108:435-444.
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.11.007. Epub 2019 Nov 19.

Neural circuits linking sleep and addiction: Animal models to understand why select individuals are more vulnerable to substance use disorders after sleep deprivation

Affiliations
Review

Neural circuits linking sleep and addiction: Animal models to understand why select individuals are more vulnerable to substance use disorders after sleep deprivation

Allison M Ahrens et al. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020 Jan.

Abstract

Individuals differ widely in their drug-craving behaviors. One reason for these differences involves sleep. Sleep disturbances lead to an increased risk of substance use disorders and relapse in only some individuals. While animal studies have examined the impact of sleep on reward circuitry, few have addressed the role of individual differences in the effects of altered sleep. There does, however, exist a rodent model of individual differences in reward-seeking behavior: the sign/goal-tracker model of Pavlovian conditioned approach. In this model, only some rats show the key behavioral traits associated with addiction, including impulsivity and poor attentional control, making this an ideal model system to examine individually distinct sleep-reward interactions. Here, we describe how the limbic neural circuits responsible for individual differences in incentive motivation overlap with those involved in sleep-wake regulation, and how this model can elucidate the common underlying mechanisms. Consideration of individual differences in preclinical models would improve our understanding of how sleep interacts with motivational systems, and why sleep deprivation contributes to addiction in only select individuals.

Keywords: Goal-tracking; Incentive salience; Individual differences; Reinforcement; Reward; Sign-tracking; Sleep.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Overlapping circuits for sleep/wake regulation and drug/reward-related encoding. There is substantial overlap in the neural pathways involved in the attribution of incentive salience to cues (red) and those that mediate the effects of sleep disturbances on motivated behavior and reward seeking (blue). Solid lines represent pathways that have been directly studied in these functions, and dashed lines represent connections that are hypothesized to play a role. There are individual differences in the degree to which rats are susceptible to the incentive motivational effects of reward cues, with some rats (STs) demonstrating stonger attraction to cues than others (GTs). Sign- and goal-tracking behavior are associated with different patterns of activity in mesolimbic circuitry, most notably expressed as greater activity in dopaminergic VTA projections (thick lines) and reduced activity in PVT and mPFC projections (thin lines) in STs relative to GTs. Since much of the same circuitry also plays a critical role in the ability of sleep to influence emotional and motivational states, this ST/GT model should reveal important information about how sleep affects reward processing, and how the loss of sleep can enhance the ability of reward cues to gain control over behavior. The regions shown represent pathways involved specifically in the ability of sleep to alter motivation for reward; brainstem mechanisms of sleep-wake regulation are not shown. Abbreviations: mPFC – medial prefrontal cortex; PVT – paraventricular nucleus of the thalamus; HPC – hippocampus; NAcc – nucleus accumbens; VP – ventral pallidum; VTA – ventral tegmental area; SCN – suprachiasmatic nucleus; AMG – amygdala.

References

    1. Adhikari A, Topiwala MA and Gordon JA (2010). Synchronized activity between the ventral hippocampus and the medial prefrontal cortex during anxiety. Neuron 65(2): 257–269. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahmed OJ, McFarland J and Kumar A (2008). Reactivation in ventral striatum during hippocampal ripples: evidence for the binding of reward and spatial memories? J Neurosci 28(40): 9895–9897. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahrens AM, Meyer PJ, Ferguson LM, Robinson TE and Aldridge JW (2016a). Neural Activity in the Ventral Pallidum Encodes Variation in the Incentive Value of a Reward Cue. J Neurosci 36(30): 7957–7970. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahrens AM, Singer BF, Fitzpatrick CJ, Morrow JD and Robinson TE (2016b). Rats that sign-track are resistant to Pavlovian but not instrumental extinction. Behav Brain Res 296: 418–430. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahrens AM, Ferguson LM, Robinson TE and Aldridge JW (2018). Dynamic Encoding of Incentive Salience in the Ventral Pallidum: Dependence on the Form of the Reward Cue. eNeuro 5(2). - PMC - PubMed

Publication types