Artery occlusion independently predicts unfavorable outcome in cervical artery dissection
- PMID: 31757869
- PMCID: PMC6988986
- DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000008654
Artery occlusion independently predicts unfavorable outcome in cervical artery dissection
Abstract
Objective: To assess the impact of dissected artery occlusion (DAO) on functional outcome and complications in patients with cervical artery dissection (CeAD).
Methods: We analyzed combined individual patient data from 3 multicenter cohorts of consecutive patients with CeAD (the Cervical Artery Dissection and Ischemic Stroke Patients [CADISP]-Plus consortium dataset). Patients with data on DAO and functional outcome were included. We compared patients with DAO to those without DAO. Primary outcome was favorable functional outcome (i.e., modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score 0-1) measured 3-6 months from baseline. Secondary outcomes included delayed cerebral ischemia, major hemorrhage, recurrent CeAD, and death. We performed univariate and multivariable binary logistic regression analyses and calculated odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), with adjustment for potential confounders.
Results: Of 2,148 patients (median age 45 years [interquartile range (IQR) 38-52], 43.6% women), 728 (33.9%) had DAO. Patients with DAO more frequently presented with cerebral ischemia (84.6% vs 58.5%, p < 0.001). Patients with DAO were less likely to have favorable outcome when compared to patients without DAO (mRS 0-1: 59.6% vs 80.1%, p unadjusted < 0.001). After adjustment for age, sex, and initial stroke severity, DAO was independently associated with less favorable outcome (mRS 0-1: OR 0.65, CI 0.50-0.84, p = 0.001). Delayed cerebral ischemia occurred more frequently in patients with DAO than in patients without DAO (4.5% vs 2.9%, p = 0.059).
Conclusion: DAO independently predicts less favorable functional outcome in patients with CeAD. Further research on vessel patency, collateral status and effects of revascularization therapies particularly in patients with DAO is warranted.
© 2019 American Academy of Neurology.
References
-
- Engelter ST, Traenka C, Lyrer P. Dissection of cervical and cerebral arteries. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2017;17:59. - PubMed
-
- Debette S, Grond-Ginsbach C, Bodenant M, et al. . Differential features of carotid and vertebral artery dissections: the CADISP study. Neurology 2011;77:1174–1181. - PubMed
-
- Lee VH, Brown RD Jr, Mandrekar JN, Mokri B. Incidence and outcome of cervical artery dissection: a population-based study. Neurology 2006;67:1809–1812. - PubMed
-
- Arnold M, Bousser MG, Fahrni G, et al. . Vertebral artery dissection: presenting findings and predictors of outcome. Stroke 2006;37:2499–2503. - PubMed
-
- Lyrer PA, Brandt T, Metso TM, et al. . Clinical import of Horner syndrome in internal carotid and vertebral artery dissection. Neurology 2014;82:1653–1659. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources