Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb;34(1):79-85.
doi: 10.1007/s00540-019-02712-7. Epub 2019 Nov 23.

Placement of TOF-Cuff® on the lower leg for neuromuscular and blood pressure monitoring during anesthetic induction for shoulder surgeries

Affiliations

Placement of TOF-Cuff® on the lower leg for neuromuscular and blood pressure monitoring during anesthetic induction for shoulder surgeries

Alexander Dullenkopf et al. J Anesth. 2020 Feb.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare two devices for neuromuscular monitoring during anesthetic induction. TOF-Cuff® was installed on the lower leg stimulating the tibial nerve, while the more conventional TOF-Scan® was installed over the ulnar nerve at the wrist. Methods Twenty adult patients were enrolled in this prospective, controlled study. Train-of-four (TOF) was recorded every 15 s until TOF ratio of 0%. Mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) was assessed with TOF-Cuff® and with standard anesthesia monitoring from the brachial artery. MAP was measured before and after anesthetic induction. Time to TOF ratio = 0% was compared with one-sample t test and Bland-Altman plots. Results Patients received 0.53 ± 0.09 mg atracurium per kg body weight intravenously. Mean time to TOF ratio = 0% was 150.8 s (± 43.7) for TOF-Scan®, and 174.4 s (± 42.7) for TOF-Cuff® (p = 0.1356). Bias was - 15.9 (95% confidence interval - 37.5 to 5.6) with 95% limits of agreement of - 95.2 to 63.3. Twenty-five percent of the patients had a technical issue with a TOF-Cuff® measurement. For MAP, mean difference was 1.4 (95% confidence interval - 2.4 to 5.2) with 95% limits of agreement of - 22.7 to 25.5. Conclusion The time from administration of a common dose of atracurium to a TOF ratio of 0% assessed with TOF-Cuff® stimulating the tibial nerve compared to TOF-Scan® stimulating the ulnar nerve showed large limits of agreement in Bland-Altman analysis. There was a high failure rate with TOF-Cuff® measurements on the lower leg.

Keywords: Accelerometry; Neuromuscular monitoring; Neuromuscular transmission.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Bland–Altman plot for time to TOF ratio = 0%. The solid line illustrates the mean difference and the dashed lines indicate average difference ± 1.96 standard deviation of the difference
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Relaxation over time for each patient for TOF-Scan® and TOF-Cuff®
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Bland–Altman plot for mean arterial (MAP) blood pressure. The solid line illustrates the weighted mean difference and the dashed lines indicate average difference ± 1.96 weighted standard deviation of the difference

References

    1. Naguib M, Brull SJ, Kopman AF, Hunter JM, Fülesdi B, Arkes HR, Elstein A, Todd MM, Johnson KB. Consensus statement on perioperative use of neuromuscular monitoring. Anesth Analg. 2018;127:71–80. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002670. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Neuromuscular MGS, Monitoring in the Perioperative Period. Anesth Analg. 2018;126:464–468. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002387. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fuchs-Buder T, Schreiber JU. Meistelman C Monitoring neuromuscular block: an update. Anaesthesia. 2009;64(Suppl 1):82–89. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05874.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mencke T, Schmartz D. Neuromuscular monitoring. Anaesthesist. 2013;62:847–861. doi: 10.1007/s00101-013-2244-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Veiga Ruiz G, Garcia Cayuela J, Orozco Montes J, Parreno Caparros M, Garcia Rojo B, Aguayo Albasini JL. Monitoring intraoperative neuromuscular blockade and blood pressure with one device (TOF-Cuff): a comparative study with mechanomyography and invasive blood pressure. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2017;64:560–567. doi: 10.1016/j.redar.2017.03.013. - DOI - PubMed