Valve-sparing root replacement in patients with bicuspid aortopathy: An analysis of cusp repair strategy and valve durability
- PMID: 31761336
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.10.048
Valve-sparing root replacement in patients with bicuspid aortopathy: An analysis of cusp repair strategy and valve durability
Abstract
Objective: Valve-sparing root replacement using reimplantation techniques is increasingly applied to bicuspid aortopathy. Long-term durability of cusp repair is unclear. We analyze midterm results using a conservative approach to cusp repair.
Methods: From 2006 to 2018, 327 patients underwent valve-sparing reimplantation, 66 with bicuspid valves. Leaflets were analyzed after reimplantation. A majority (51/66) required no cusp repair. Fifteen patients had cusp repair limited to closure of unfused raphe or central plication. Patients were followed by echocardiography.
Results: Mean age of patients was 44.7 ± 12.3 years. The cusp repair group had a higher incidence of preoperative moderate (10% vs 40%) or severe (4% vs 33.3%) aortic insufficiency (P < .001). There was no operative mortality or major complication. Mean follow-up was 51.6 ± 40.8 months. On postoperative echocardiography, incidence of none, trace, or mild aortic insufficiency was 41.3% (19/46), 43.5% (20/46), and 15.2% (7/46) in the no cusp repair group and 40% (6/15), 40% (6/15), and 20% (3/15) in the cusp repair group, respectively (P = .907). Few patients progressed in degree of aortic insufficiency. No patients required reoperation. At 5 years, freedom from any aortic insufficiency was 46.9% versus 15.8% (P = .013), and freedom from greater than trace aortic insufficiency was 59.1% versus 36.9% (P = .002) due to the higher rate of postoperative trace and mild aortic insufficiency with cusp repair. There was no difference in freedom from greater than mild aortic insufficiency (92.1% vs 100%; P = .33).
Conclusions: Valve-sparing root replacement is reliably performed with bicuspid aortic valves whether or not cusp reconstruction is necessary. Few patients progress to greater than mild aortic insufficiency. Need for reoperation is rare in midterm follow-up.
Keywords: aorta; aortic aneurysm; aortic root replacement; valve-sparing surgery.
Copyright © 2019 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Commentary: To repair or not repair-that is the question.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Feb;161(2):480-481. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.10.189. Epub 2019 Nov 22. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021. PMID: 31959435 No abstract available.
-
Commentary: Valve-sparing root replacement in bicuspid valves-more than technique.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Feb;161(2):481-482. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.12.033. Epub 2020 Jan 3. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021. PMID: 32067785 No abstract available.
-
Commentary: Beauty, and durability, is in the eye of the needle holder.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Feb;161(2):479-480. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.03.134. Epub 2020 Apr 11. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021. PMID: 32387161 No abstract available.
-
Can root repair alone abolish aortic insufficiency in bicuspid aortopathy?J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Jan;163(1):e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.03.040. Epub 2021 Apr 15. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022. PMID: 33863496 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
