Cardiac toxicity of lung cancer radiotherapy
- PMID: 31762693
- PMCID: PMC6864155
- DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2019.10.007
Cardiac toxicity of lung cancer radiotherapy
Abstract
Radical radiotherapy of lung cancer with dose escalation has been associated with increased tumor control. However, these attempts to continually improve local control through dose escalation, have met mixed results culminating in the findings of the RTOG trial 0617, where the heart dose was associated with a worse overall survival, indicating a significant contribution to radiation-induced cardiac morbidity. It is, therefore, very likely that poorly understood cardiac toxicity may have offset any potential improvement in overall survival derived from dose escalation and may be an obstacle that limits disease control and survival of patients. The manifestations of cardiac toxicity are relatively common after high dose radiotherapy of advanced lung cancers and are independently associated with both heart dose and baseline cardiac risk. Toxicity following the treatment may occur earlier than previously thought and, therefore, heart doses should be minimized. In patients with lung cancer, who not only receive substantial heart dose, but are also older with more comorbidities, all cardiac events have the potential to be clinically significant and life-threatening. Sophisticated radiation treatment planning techniques, charged particle therapy, and modern imaging methods in radiotherapy planning, may lead to reduction of the heart dose, which could potentially improve the clinical outcomes in patients with lung cancer. Efforts should be made to minimize heart radiation exposure whenever possible even at doses lower than those generally recommended. Heart doses should be limited as much as possible. A heart dosimetry as a whole is important for patient outcomes, rather than emphasizing just one parameter.
Keywords: Cardiac toxicity; Heart dose constraints; Lung cancer; Thoracic radiotherapy.
© 2019 Greater Poland Cancer Centre. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
References
-
- Bray F., Ferlay J., Soerjomataram I., Siegel R.L., Torre L.A., Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424. - PubMed
-
- Bradley J.D., Paulus R., Komaki R. Standard-dose versus high-dose conformal radiotherapy with concurrent and consolidation carboplatin plus paclitaxel with or without cetuximab for patients with stage IIIA or IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer (RTOG 0617): a randomised, two-by-two factorial phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(2):187–199. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Majem M., Hernández-Hernández J., Hernando-Trancho F. Multidisciplinary consensus statement on the clinical management of patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Transl Oncol. 2019 [Epub ahead of print] - PubMed
-
- Machtay M., Bae K., Movsas B. Higher biologically effective dose of radiotherapy is associated with improved outcomes for locally advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma treated with chemoradiation: an analysis of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;82(1):425–434. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Jett J.R., Schild S.E., Kesler K.A., Kalemkerian G.P. Treatment of small cell lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2013;143(5 Suppl):e400S–e419S. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
