Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Nov;20(6):266-273.
doi: 10.1177/1757177419852662. Epub 2019 Jun 4.

Cost-effectiveness of interventions to reduce the risk of healthcare-acquired infections in middle-income countries: A systematic review

Affiliations
Review

Cost-effectiveness of interventions to reduce the risk of healthcare-acquired infections in middle-income countries: A systematic review

Pushpa Udayangani Gamalathge et al. J Infect Prev. 2019 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Hospital-acquired infections (HAI) contribute to prolonged hospital stays and account for a substantial economic burden to healthcare systems. Middle-income countries (MICs) experience a greater burden of HAI than developed countries. Evidence on the cost-effectiveness of interventions to reduce HAI is required to inform decision-making in these settings.

Aim: To synthesise the evidence on cost-effectiveness as related to HAI interventions in MICs and to assess the quality of this evidence.

Methods: A systematic review of published literature on the cost-effectiveness of interventions to reduce the incidence of HAI in MICs between 2000 and 2018 was conducted.

Results: Six studies met the pre-determined inclusion criteria. The studies were from three countries: Thailand; India; and Vietnam. The evidence suggests that interventions to reduce HAI are cost-effective and, in most cases, cost-saving to healthcare systems. The quality of the reporting varied across studies.

Conclusions: The implementation of HAI prevention interventions appears to be a high value use of resources in MICs. There is a need for further cost-effectiveness analyses in a wider range of MICs in order to confirm these findings. Improved standardisation and quality of reporting is required.

Keywords: Cost-effectiveness; economic evaluation; healthcare-associated infections; infection control; middle-income countries.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
PRISMA flow chart for selection of articles for the review.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Allegranzi B, Nejad SB, Combescure C, Graafmans W, Attar H, Donaldson L, Pittet D. (2011) Burden of endemic health-care-associated infection in developing countries: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 377: 228–241. - PubMed
    1. Arefian H, Vogel M, Kwetkat A, Hartmann M. (2016) Economic evaluation of interventions for prevention of hospital acquired infections: a systematic review. PLoS One 11: e0146381. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cheng Q, Graves N, Pacella RE. (2018) Economic evaluations of guideline-based care for chronic wounds: a systematic review. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy 16: 633–651. - PubMed
    1. Coyle D, Lee KM. (2002) Evidence-based economic evaluation: how the use of different data sources can impact results. In: Donaldson M. (ed.) Evidence-Based Health Economics: From Effectiveness to Efficiency in Systematic Review. London: BMJ Books.
    1. Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Claxton K, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW. (2015) Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

LinkOut - more resources