Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb 1;35(1):15-31.
doi: 10.1093/her/cyz032.

A process evaluation of the Communication for Healthy Communities adolescent health program in Uganda

Judith Nalukwago  1   2   3 , Jane Alaii  4 , Bart van den Borne  1 , Paul Mukisa Bukuluki  3 , Musa Kimbowa  2 , Emily Bockh  5 , Sheila Marunga Coutinho  2 , Rik Crutzen  1
Affiliations

A process evaluation of the Communication for Healthy Communities adolescent health program in Uganda

Judith Nalukwago et al. Health Educ Res. .

Abstract

This study is a process evaluation of an adolescent-focused intervention of the USAID Communication for Healthy Communities program, in Uganda. We used mixed methods including observation, consultations and review of program documents to collect data on program coverage, reach and factors influencing implementation. Findings show that program activities were successfully implemented through collaborative partnerships with service partners and the community. Interpersonal communication complemented by mass-media messaging was effective in reaching and empowering adolescents with health information to make informed choices for behavior change. The program used theoretical frameworks to guide targeted interventions through audience segmentation and community empowerment. Targeted mass-media messaging and placement was found to be pertinent for program reach. Working through existing community structures is important for an effective reach of health promotion programs. Lessons identified for scaling-up adolescent health programs include the need to harmonize training and deployment of community champions by development partners, recruit audience-specific influential champions and link income-generating activities to health education interventions. There is thus need to collaboratively develop and institutionalize effective monitoring and evaluation strategies during program inception and design phases for appropriate accountability, ownership and a continuation of gains.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Obulamu? Life Cycle approach.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
CHC's 360-degree communication approach for the ARC program.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
An illustration of the social ecological model. Source: Mckee et al. [20].
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
A summary of contextual issues identified before and during implementation of the ARC program for adolescent and young adult females. IPC, interpersonal communication; HC, health communication.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
Obulamu? Values Clarification Tool used by CHC for the ARC program.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Idele P, Gillespie A, Porth T. et al. Epidemiology of HIV and AIDS among adolescents: current status, inequities, and data gaps. J Acq Immune Def Synd 2014; 66: S144–53. - PubMed
    1. Hardee K, Gay J, Croce-Galis M. et al. What HIV programs work for adolescent girls? J Acq Immune Def Synd 2014; 66: S176–85. - PubMed
    1. Ministry of Health (MOH). Health Sector Development Plan 2015/16-2019/20. Uganda, Kampala: Government of Uganda, 2015.
    1. Atuyambe LM, Kibira SP, Bukenya J. et al. Understanding sexual and reproductive health needs of adolescents: evidence from a formative evaluation in Wakiso district, Uganda. Reprod Health 2015; 12: 35. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nalukwago J, Crutzen R, van den Borne B. et al. Socio-cognitive factors associated with condom use, multiple sexual partnerships, and contraception use among sexually-active adolescent girls in Uganda. Global J Health Sci 2018; 10: 41.

Publication types