A CHIP fellow's transition into practice: Building a complex coronary therapeutics program
- PMID: 31763767
- DOI: 10.1002/ccd.28599
A CHIP fellow's transition into practice: Building a complex coronary therapeutics program
Abstract
Background: Both the prevalence and complexity of coronary artery disease are on the rise in the United States, leading to a resurgence in novel techniques and equipment utilized to treat complex coronary disease. However, declining percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) volumes and lack of formal post-graduate education opportunities have created a gap in treatment delivery for this patient population. Several complex, high-risk, and indicated PCI (CHIP) fellowships have been developed in an attempt to bridge this disparity. We present data from the first year of practice from a former CHIP fellow during development of a formal complex coronary therapeutics program.
Methods: Data was prospectively collected for PCIs performed during the first 12 months of practice for the lead author and compared to procedures performed in the 12 months prior to the study period.
Results: Out of 371 PCIs performed during the study period, 53.4% (198/371) were considered complex, including 126 chronic total occlusion (CTO) procedures. Compared to the previous 12 months, there was a significant increase in the number and complexity (median J-CTO score 2.1 vs. 1.3, p .04) of CTOs performed during the study period. CTO procedural characteristics and complication rates were similar to those previously published in large U.S. registries, with technical success in 93.4% (118/126) and procedural success in 85.7% (108/126).
Conclusion: Following dedicated CHIP fellowship training and establishment of a formal CHIP program, procedural success and complication rates were achieved similar to those published in prior studies evaluating CTO PCI at high volume centers.
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Comment in
-
Reply to: Letter to the Editor.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Nov;96(5):E562. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28831. Epub 2020 Mar 5. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020. PMID: 32134173 No abstract available.
-
Re: A CHiP fellow's transition into practice: Building a complex coronary therapeutics program.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Nov;96(5):E561. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28838. Epub 2020 Mar 5. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020. PMID: 32134184 No abstract available.
-
CHIP fellowships: Carving a path for complex PCI.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Nov;96(5):1065-1066. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29336. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020. PMID: 33156963 No abstract available.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Venkitachalam L, Kip KE, Selzer F, et al. Twenty-year evolution of percutaneous coronary intervention and its impact on clinical outcomes: a report from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-sponsored, multicenter 1985-1986 PTCA and 1997-2006 dynamic registries. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;2(1):6-13.
-
- Singh M, Peterson ED, Roe MT, et al. Trends in the association between age and in-hospital mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention: National Cardiovascular Data Registry experience. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;2(1):20-26.
-
- Stone GW, Sabik JF, Serruys PW, et al. Everolimus-eluting stents or bypass surgery for left main coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(23):2223-2235.
-
- Sapontis J, Salisbury AC, Yeh RW, et al. Early procedural and health status outcomes after chronic total occlusion angioplasty: a report from the OPEN-CTO registry (outcomes, patient health status, and efficiency in chronic total occlusion hybrid procedures). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10(15):1523-1534.
-
- Watt J, Austin D, Mackay D, Nolan J, Oldroyd KG. Radial versus femoral access for rotational atherectomy: a UK observational study of 8622 patients. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10(12):e005311.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous