Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Feb;43(2):139-145.
doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000641.

Genomic and Molecular Abnormalities in Gynecologic Clear Cell Carcinoma

Affiliations
Review

Genomic and Molecular Abnormalities in Gynecologic Clear Cell Carcinoma

Eric I Marks et al. Am J Clin Oncol. 2020 Feb.

Abstract

Gynecologic clear cell carcinoma is a rare histology, accounting for ~5% of all ovarian and endometrial cancers in the United States. Compared to other types of gynecologic cancer, they are generally less responsive to standard therapy and have an overall worse prognosis. In addition, mounting evidence suggests that the landscape of genetic and molecular abnormalities observed in these tumors is distinct from other cancers that arise from the same sites of origin. On a molecular level, these tumors characteristically display upregulation of the PI3K-AKT-mTOR and RAS-RAF-MAPK signaling axes, frequent loss of ARID1a, and overexpression of MDM2. Evidence also suggests that these tumors are more likely to express programmed death ligand 1 or demonstrate microsatellite instability than other gynecologic cancers. Despite these important differences, there has been relatively little investigation into histology-specific treatment of clear cell gynecologic cancers, representing an opportunity for new drug development. In this article, we review the unique genetic and molecular features of gynecologic clear cell cancers with an emphasis on potential therapeutic targets. The results of completed studies of treatment for clear cell carcinoma are also presented. We conclude with a discussion of ongoing clinical trials and potential avenues for future study.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Chan JK, Teoh D, Hu JM, et al. Do clear cell ovarian carcinomas have poorer prognosis compared to other epithelial cell types? A study of 1411 clear cell ovarian cancers. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;109:370–376.
    1. Gadducci A, Cosio S, Spirito N, et al. Clear cell carcinoma of the endometrium: a biological and clinical enigma. Anticancer Res. 2010;30:1327–1334.
    1. Aoki D. Annual report of Gynecologic Oncology Committee, Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2013. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014;40:338–348.
    1. Reid BM, Permuth JB, Sellers TA. Epidemiology of ovarian cancer: a review. Cancer Biol Med. 2017;14:9–32.
    1. Melnick S, Cole P, Anderson D, et al. Rates and risks of diethylstilbestrol-related clear-cell adenocarcinoma of the vagina and cervix. An update. N Engl J Med. 1987;316:514–516.

MeSH terms

Substances