Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar;161(3):651-661.
doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001758.

Graded chronic pain scale revised: mild, bothersome, and high-impact chronic pain

Affiliations

Graded chronic pain scale revised: mild, bothersome, and high-impact chronic pain

Michael Von Korff et al. Pain. 2020 Mar.

Abstract

Drawing on advances in chronic pain metrics, a simplified Graded Chronic Pain Scale-Revised was developed to differentiate mild, bothersome, and high-impact chronic pain. Graded Chronic Pain Scale-Revised was validated among adult enrollees of 2 health plans (N = 2021). In this population, the prevalence of chronic pain (pain present most or every day, prior 3 months) was 40.5%: 15.4% with mild chronic pain (lower pain intensity and interference); 10.1% bothersome chronic pain (moderate to severe pain intensity with lower interference with life activities); and 15.0% high-impact chronic pain (sustained pain-related activity limitations). Persons with mild chronic pain vs those without chronic pain showed small differences on 10 health status indicators (unfavorable health perceptions, activity limitations, and receiving long-term opioid therapy), with nonsignificant differences for 7 of 10 indicators. Persons with bothersome vs mild chronic pain differed significantly on 6 of 10 indicators (eg, negative pain coping beliefs, psychological distress, unfavorable health perceptions, and pain-related interference with overall activities). Persons with high-impact chronic pain differed significantly from those with mild chronic pain on all 10 indicators. Persons with high-impact chronic pain, relative to those with bothersome chronic pain, were more likely to have substantial activity limitations (significant differences for 4 of 5 disability indicators) and more often received long-term opioid therapy. Graded Chronic Pain Scale-Revised strongly predicted 5 activity-limitation indicators with area under receiver operating characteristic curve coefficients of 0.76 to 0.89. We conclude that the 5-item Graded Chronic Pain Scale-Revised and its scoring rules provide a brief, simple, and valid method for assessing chronic pain.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Graded Chronic Pain Scale - Revised
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Chronic pain grade scoring rules for Graded Chronic Pain Scale – Revised

References

    1. Arnow BA, Blasey CM, Constantino MJ, Robinson R, Hunkeler E, Lee J, Fireman B, Khaylis A, Feiner L, Hayward C. Catastrophizing, depression and pain-related disability. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2011; 33:150–156. - PubMed
    1. Bair MJ, Poleshuck EL, Wu J, Krebs EK, Damush TM, Tu W, Kroenke K, Anxiety but not Social Stressors Predict 12-Month Depression and Pain Severity. Clin J Pain. 2013. February; 29(2):95–101. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boonstra AM, Schiphorst Preuper HR, Balk GA, Stewart RE. Cut-off points for mild, moderate, and severe pain on the visual analogue scale for pain in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Pain 2014; 155:2545–2550. - PubMed
    1. Bree Collaborative. Bree Collaborative Opioid Prescribing Metrics. http://www.breecollaborative.org/wp-content/uploads/Bree-Opioid-Prescrib.... Accessed 8/7/2019.
    1. Chen CX, Kroenke K, Stump T, Kean J, Krebs EE, Bair MJ, Damush T, Monahan PO. Comparative responsiveness of the PROMIS pain interference short forms with legacy pain measures: results from three randomized clinical trials. J Pain 2019;20(6):664–675. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types