Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Nov 21;16(23):4638.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph16234638.

Exit and Entry Screening Practices for Infectious Diseases among Travelers at Points of Entry: Looking for Evidence on Public Health Impact

Affiliations

Exit and Entry Screening Practices for Infectious Diseases among Travelers at Points of Entry: Looking for Evidence on Public Health Impact

Varvara A Mouchtouri et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

A scoping search and a systematic literature review were conducted to give an insight on entry and exit screening referring to travelers at points of entry, by analyzing published evidence on practices, guidelines, and experiences in the past 15 years worldwide. Grey literature, PubMed. and Scopus were searched using specific terms. Most of the available data identified through the systematic literature review concerned entry screening measures at airports. Little evidence is available about entry and exit screening measure implementation and effectiveness at ports and ground crossings. Exit screening was part of the World Health Organisation's (WHO) temporary recommendations for implementation in certain points of entry, for specific time periods. Exit screening measures for Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) in the three most affected West African countries did not identify any cases and showed zero sensitivity and very low specificity. The percentages of confirmed cases identified out of the total numbers of travelers that passed through entry screening measures in various countries worldwide for Influenza Pandemic (H1N1) and EVD in West Africa were zero or extremely low. Entry screening measures for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) did not detect any confirmed SARS cases in Australia, Canada, and Singapore. Despite the ineffectiveness of entry and exit screening measures, authors reported several important concomitant positive effects that their impact is difficult to assess, including discouraging travel of ill persons, raising awareness, and educating the traveling public and maintaining operation of flights from/to the affected areas. Exit screening measures in affected areas are important and should be applied jointly with other measures including information strategies, epidemiological investigation, contact tracing, vaccination, and quarantine to achieve a comprehensive outbreak management response. Based on review results, an algorithm about decision-making for entry/exit screening was developed.

Keywords: IHR; PHEIC; airport; border; ground crossing; health measure; points of entry; port; screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure A1
Figure A1
Algorithm for making evidence-based decisions in implementing entry and exit screening measures at points of entry.
Figure A1
Figure A1
Algorithm for making evidence-based decisions in implementing entry and exit screening measures at points of entry.
Figure A1
Figure A1
Algorithm for making evidence-based decisions in implementing entry and exit screening measures at points of entry.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of study selection process.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Published entry and exit screening measures in response to SARS outbreak [8,9,23,35,42].
Figure 3
Figure 3
Published entry screening measures in response to Influenza Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 [20,21,24,32,33,36,40].
Figure 4
Figure 4
Published entry and exit screening measures in response to Ebola virus disease outbreak [16,27,31,34,38,41].

References

    1. World Health Organization [(accessed on 8 August 2018)];Technical Note for Ebola Virus Disease Preparedness Planning for Entry Screening at Airports, Ports and Land Crossings. 2014 Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/144819.
    1. World Health Organization [(accessed on 3 July 2018)];Handbook for Management of Public Health Events on Board Ships. 2016 Available online: https://www.who.int/ihr/publications/9789241549462/en/
    1. World Health Organization . International Health Regulations (2005) 3rd ed. World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2016.
    1. European Council Decision No 1082/2013/Eu of the European Parliament and of The Council of 22 October 2013 on serious cross-border threats to health and repealing Decision No 2119/98/EC. Off. J. Eur. Union. 2013;L 293:1–15.
    1. World Health Organization [(accessed on 8 November 2018)];International Health Regulations. IHR Procedures and Implementation. 2018 Available online: https://www.who.int/ihr/procedures/en/

Publication types

MeSH terms