Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2019 Nov 27;48(1):67.
doi: 10.1186/s40463-019-0386-z.

Comparison of the anatomical and functional success of fascia and perichondrium grafts in transcanal endoscopic type 1 tympanoplasty

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of the anatomical and functional success of fascia and perichondrium grafts in transcanal endoscopic type 1 tympanoplasty

Kadir Özdamar et al. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. .

Abstract

Background: There are no studies in the literature, comparing the functional and anatomical successes of the use of fascial and perichondrial grafts in endoscopic type 1 tympanoplasties.

Objectives: To compare the anatomical and functional outcomes of grafting with the fascia of the temporalis muscle and with the perichondrium of the tragal cartilage in patients undergoing primary transcanal type 1 tympanoplasty with endoscopy.

Methods: We enrolled a total of 151 patients (80 females and 71 males with a mean age of 26.0 ± 9.3 years in the age range between 18-57) with MERI scores ranging from 1 to 3 and who underwent a transcanal endoscopic type 1 tympanoplasty without tympanomeatal flap elevation. The patients were assigned to two groups according to the type of the graft used. The patients were assigned to either the tragal cartilage perichondrium group (Group A) or the fascia of the temporal muscle (Group B). The groups were compared according to the pre- and postoperative air-bone gaps and to the status of the tympanic membrane.

Results: There were no statistically significant differences in the distribution of the age, gender, localization, MERI scores, the duration of the operation, and the size of the perforation (all p values> 0.05). The pre-operative air-bone gap values of Group A and B did not show a statistically significant difference (p = 0.073). The postoperative improvement in the air-bone gap value did not demonstrate a significant difference between Group A and B (p = 0.202). The graft retention rates were 94.9 and 97.2% in Group A and in Group B respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of the graft retention success rates (p = 0.743).

Conclusion: Perichondrium and fascia were suitable for use in endoscopic tympanoplasties.

Keywords: Endoscopic tympanoplasty; Fascia; Perichondrium; Transcanal.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Comparison of air-bone gap between the perichondrium and fascia groups

References

    1. Yegin Y, Çelik M, Koç AK, Küfeciler L, Elbistanlı MS, Kayhan FT. Comparison of temporalis fascia muscle and full-thickness cartilage grafts in type 1 pediatric tympanoplasties. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;82(6):695–701. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2015.12.009. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mohanty S, Manimaran V, Umamaheswaran P, Jeyabalakrishnan S, Chelladurai S. Endoscopic cartilage versus temporalis fascia grafting for anterior quadrant tympanic perforations — a prospective study in a tertiary care hospital. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2018;45(5):936–942. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2018.01.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rizer FM. Overlay versus underlay tympanoplasty. Part 1: Histolorical review of the literature. Laryngoscope. 1997;107:1–25. doi: 10.1097/00005537-199712001-00001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zoellner F. The principles of plastic surgery of the sound-conducting apparatus. J Laryngol Otol. 1955;69:567–569. doi: 10.1017/S0022215100051094. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wullstein HL. Functional operations in the middle ear with split-thickness skin graft. Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1953;161:422–435. doi: 10.1007/BF02129204. - DOI

Publication types