Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Summer;5(1):60-73.
doi: 10.14338/IJPT-18-00016.1. Epub 2018 Sep 21.

Molecular Signaling in Response to Charged Particle Exposures and its Importance in Particle Therapy

Affiliations
Review

Molecular Signaling in Response to Charged Particle Exposures and its Importance in Particle Therapy

Christine E Hellweg et al. Int J Part Ther. 2018 Summer.

Abstract

Energetic, charged particles elicit an orchestrated DNA damage response (DDR) during their traversal through healthy tissues and tumors. Complex DNA damage formation, after exposure to high linear energy transfer (LET) charged particles, results in DNA repair foci formation, which begins within seconds. More protein modifications occur after high-LET, compared with low-LET, irradiation. Charged-particle exposure activates several transcription factors that are cytoprotective or cytodestructive, or that upregulate cytokine and chemokine expression, and are involved in bystander signaling. Molecular signaling for a survival or death decision in different tumor types and healthy tissues should be studied as prerequisite for shaping sensitizing and protective strategies. Long-term signaling and gene expression changes were found in various tissues of animals exposed to charged particles, and elucidation of their role in chronic and late effects of charged-particle therapy will help to develop effective preventive measures.

Keywords: DNA damage response; DNA repair foci; bystander effect; linear energy transfer; nuclear factor κB.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Examples of complex DNA damage. For details, see text. Adapted from Georgakilas [113], DNA structure from Wikimedia Commons.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Molecular signaling and outcome after charged particle exposure. For details, see text
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Formation of charged particle-induced foci at sites of complex DNA double strand breaks. For details, see text. Only proteins that were experimentally shown to accumulate at charged particle induced damage sites are shown. Adapted from Bekker-Jensen and Mailand [114] and references in the text. Not all proteins shown here might accumulate in every charged particle-induced focus; for example DNA-PK and Artemis are generally involved in nonhomologous end-joining, and BRCA1 and RPA in homologous recombination, indicating the branching into one of these DNA double-strand break repair pathways.

References

    1. Bhattacharya S, Asaithamby A. Repurposing DNA repair factors to eradicate tumor cells upon radiotherapy. Transl Cancer Res. 2017;6:S822–39. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Datta K, Suman S, Kumar S, Fornace AJ., Jr Colorectal carcinogenesis, radiation quality, and the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. J Cancer. 2016;7:174–83. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cox R, Thacker J, Goodhead DT, Munson RJ. Mutation and inactivation of mammalian cells by various ionising radiations. Nature. 1977;267:425–7. - PubMed
    1. Skarsgard LD, Kihlman BA, Parker L, Pujara CM, Richardson S. Survival, chromosome abnormalities, and recovery in heavy-ion and x-irradiated mammalian cells. Radiat Res Suppl. 1967;7:208–21. - PubMed
    1. Brenner DJ, Ward JF. Constraints on energy deposition and target size of multiply damaged sites associated with DNA double-strand breaks. Int J Radiat Biol. 1992;61:737–48. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources