Bowel preparation prior to minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy: a randomized controlled trial
- PMID: 31773199
- PMCID: PMC7247935
- DOI: 10.1007/s00192-019-04120-7
Bowel preparation prior to minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy: a randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis: The objective was to determine if a bowel preparation prior to minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy (MIS) influences post-operative constipation symptoms. We hypothesized that women who underwent a bowel preparation would have an improvement in post-operative defecatory function.
Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, women undergoing MIS received a pre-operative bowel preparation or no bowel preparation. Our primary outcome was post-operative constipation measured by the Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms (PAC-SYM) 2 weeks post-operatively. Secondary outcomes included surgeon's perception of case difficulty. Both intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol analyses (PPA) were performed. Analyses were carried out using t test, Fisher's exact test, the Wilcoxon test and the Chi-squared test.
Results: Of 105 enrolled women, 95 completed follow-up (43 preparation and 52 no preparation). Baseline characteristics and rates of complications were similar. No differences were noted on ITT. The post-operative abdominal PAC-SYM subscale was closer to baseline for women who received a bowel preparation on PPA (change in score 0.74 vs 1.08, p = 0.045). Women who underwent a preparation were less likely to report strain (6.0% vs 26.7%, p = 0.009) or type 1 Bristol stool on their first post-operative bowel movement (4.3% vs 17.5%, p = 0.047). Surgeons were more likely to rate the complexity of the case as "more difficult than average" (54.4% vs 40.1%, p = 0.027) in those without a bowel preparation.
Conclusions: Although there was no difference in ITT analysis, women who underwent a bowel preparation prior to MIS demonstrated benefit to post-operative defecatory function with a corresponding improvement in surgeon's perception of case complexity.
Keywords: Bowel prep; Constipation; PAC-SYM; Pelvic organ prolapse; Sacrocolpopexy.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
References
-
- Wells T, Plante M, McAlpine JN, Preoperative bowel preparation in gynecologic oncology: a review of practice patterns and an impetus to change. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2011. 21(6): p. 1135–42. - PubMed
-
- Slim K, Vicaut E, Launay-Savary MV, Contant C, Chipponi J, Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials on the role of mechanical bowel preparation before colorectal surgery. Annals Surg, 2009. 249(2): p. 203–9. - PubMed
-
- Muzii L, Bellati F, Zullo MA, Manci N, Angioli R, Panici PB, Mechanical bowel preparation before gynecologic laparoscopy: a randomized, single-blind, controlled trial. Fertil Steril, 2006. 85(3): p. 689–93. - PubMed
-
- Siedhoff M, Clark LH, Hobbs KA, Findley AD, Moulder JK, Garrett JM, Mechanical bowel preparation before laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol, 2014. 123(3): p. 562–7. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
