Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Feb;40(3):301-310.
doi: 10.1002/pd.5611. Epub 2019 Nov 29.

International perspectives on the implementation of reproductive carrier screening

Affiliations
Review

International perspectives on the implementation of reproductive carrier screening

Martin B Delatycki et al. Prenat Diagn. 2020 Feb.

Abstract

Reproductive carrier screening started in some countries in the 1970s for hemoglobinopathies and Tay-Sachs disease. Cystic fibrosis carrier screening became possible in the late 1980s and with technical advances, screening of an ever increasing number of genes has become possible. The goal of carrier screening is to inform people about their risk of having children with autosomal recessive and X-linked recessive disorders, to allow for informed decision making about reproductive options. The consequence may be a decrease in the birth prevalence of these conditions, which has occurred in several countries for some conditions. Different programs target different groups (high school, premarital, couples before conception, couples attending fertility clinics, and pregnant women) as does the governance structure (public health initiative and user pays). Ancestry-based offers of screening are being replaced by expanded carrier screening panels with multiple genes that is independent of ancestry. This review describes screening in Australia, Cyprus, Israel, Italy, Malaysia, the Netherlands, Saudi Arabia, the United Kingdom, and the United States. It provides an insight into the enormous variability in how reproductive carrier screening is offered across the globe. This largely relates to geographical variation in carrier frequencies of genetic conditions and local health care, financial, cultural, and religious factors.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Chokoshvili D, Vears D, Borry P. Expanded carrier screening for monogenic disorders: where are we now? Prenat Diagn. 2018;38(1):59-66.
    1. Delatycki M, Laing N, Moore S, et al. Preconception and antenatal carrier screening for genetic conditions: the critical role of general practitioners. Aust J Gen Pract. 2019;48(3):106-110.
    1. Davies SC, Cronin E, Gill M, Greengross P, Hickman M, Normand C. Screening for sickle cell disease and thalassaemia: a systematic review with supplementary research. Health Technol Assess. 2000;4:i-v. 1-99
    1. Kaback MM, Nathan TJ, Greenwald S. Tay-Sachs disease: heterozygote screening and prenatal diagnosis-U.S. experience and world perspective. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1977;18:13-36.
    1. Watson EK, Mayall E, Chapple J, et al. Screening for carriers of cystic fibrosis through primary health care services. BMJ. 1991;303(6801):504-507.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources