Comparison of open and endoscopic carpal tunnel surgery regarding clinical outcomes, complication and return to daily life: A prospective comparative study
- PMID: 31777488
- PMCID: PMC6861491
- DOI: 10.12669/pjms.35.6.967
Comparison of open and endoscopic carpal tunnel surgery regarding clinical outcomes, complication and return to daily life: A prospective comparative study
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to compare the clinical results and complications as well as patient satisfaction in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome operated with open carpal tunnel release (OCTR) or endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) techniques.
Methods: This study conducted in Istanbul Training and Research Hospital between August 2016 and January 2018. A total of 54 patients were operated with the ECTR technique and 50 patients were operated with the OCTR technique after failing nonsurgical treatment. Patients functional scores are assessed with the carpal tunnel syndrome-functional status score (CTS-FSS) and carpal tunnel syndrome-symptom severity score (CTS-SSS). Operation time, incision length and complications of the two techniques were noted and compared.
Results: The age, sex distribution, distribution of sides, and complaint period were not significant (p > 0.05) between the groups. The preoperative or postoperative CTS-SSS and CTS-FSS values did not differ significantly (p > 0.05). Incision length, time to return to work and return to daily life in the OCTR group was significantly higher than the ECTR group (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: ECTR has similar results in terms of symptom relief, severity, functional status, pillar pain and complication rates compared to OCTR. However, it has the advantages of early return to daily life, early return to work and less incision length.
Keywords: Carpal tunnel release; Carpal tunnel syndrome; Endoscopy.
Copyright: © Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Comparing endoscopic and conventional surgery techniques for carpal tunnel syndrome: A retrospective study.JPRAS Open. 2024 May 22;41:80-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jpra.2024.05.003. eCollection 2024 Sep. JPRAS Open. 2024. PMID: 38911671 Free PMC article.
-
Endoscopic Versus Open Carpal Tunnel Release: A Systematic Review of Outcomes and Complications.Cureus. 2024 Jul 20;16(7):e64991. doi: 10.7759/cureus.64991. eCollection 2024 Jul. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39165434 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Carpal Tunnel Release Surgery- A Systematic Review of Open and Endoscopic Approaches.Anesth Pain Med. 2020 Dec 26;10(6):e112291. doi: 10.5812/aapm.112291. eCollection 2020 Dec. Anesth Pain Med. 2020. PMID: 34150584 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparison of early clinical outcome in carpal tunnel release - mini-open technique with palmar incision vs. endoscopic technique with wrist crease incision.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Apr 1;25(1):251. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-07151-w. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024. PMID: 38561698 Free PMC article.
-
Prospective, randomized evaluation of endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel release in bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome: an interim analysis.Ann Plast Surg. 2014 Dec;73 Suppl 2:S157-60. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000203. Ann Plast Surg. 2014. PMID: 25046667 Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
Open versus Single- or Dual-Portal Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Hand (N Y). 2023 Sep;18(6):978-986. doi: 10.1177/15589447221075665. Epub 2022 Feb 18. Hand (N Y). 2023. PMID: 35179060 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing the Efficacy of Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Repair Versus Open Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Control Trials.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025 Jun 23;13(6):e6887. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006887. eCollection 2025 Jun. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025. PMID: 40552065 Free PMC article.
-
Surgical Interventions for the Management of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Narrative Review.Cureus. 2024 Mar 5;16(3):e55593. doi: 10.7759/cureus.55593. eCollection 2024 Mar. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 38576667 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Best-Evidence Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release Outcomes.J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2023 Aug 29;5(6):768-773. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2023.07.011. eCollection 2023 Nov. J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2023. PMID: 38106929 Free PMC article.
-
Two-port Endoscopic Surgery for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome - A Prospective Cohort Study.Malays Orthop J. 2022 Jul;16(2):55-62. doi: 10.5704/MOJ.2207.007. Malays Orthop J. 2022. PMID: 35992988 Free PMC article.
References
-
- English JH, Gwynne-Jones DP. Incidence of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Requiring Surgical Decompression:A 10.5-Year Review of 2,309 Patients. J Hand Surg Am. 2015;40(12):2427–2434. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.07.029. - PubMed
-
- Graham B, Regehr G, Naglie G, Wright JG. Development and validation of diagnostic criteria for carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am. 2006;31(6):919–924. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2006.03.005. - PubMed
-
- Palumbo CF, Szabo RM. Examination of patients for carpal tunnel syndrome sensibility, provocative, and motor testing. Hand Clin. 2002;18(2):269–277. doi:10.1016/S0749-0712(01)00007-5. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials