Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Nov-Dec;35(6):1674-1679.
doi: 10.12669/pjms.35.6.703.

Multi-level barriers & priorities accorded by policy makers for Neonatal Hearing Screening (NHS) in Pakistan: A thematic analysis

Nazia Mumtaz  1 , Muhammad Naveed Babur  2 , Ghulam Saqulain  3
Affiliations

Multi-level barriers & priorities accorded by policy makers for Neonatal Hearing Screening (NHS) in Pakistan: A thematic analysis

Nazia Mumtaz et al. Pak J Med Sci. 2019 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

Objectives: To explore the Barriers and Priorities accorded to neo-natal hearing screening at government health policy level.

Methods: This exploratory descriptive study design employed qualitative parameters with purposive sampling and was conducted at Capital Administration & Development Division (CADD) and Ministry of National Health Services, Regulations & Coordination (MoNHSR&C) from June 2015 to January 2017 over a period of 18 months. Sample included stakeholders concerned with healthcare planning and policy making in Pakistan. Research included in depth interviews using a self-structured interview guide from three policy makers' fulfilling the selection criteria. Data recorded was transcribed and thematic analyses drawn manually and verified using two separate coders.

Results: Outcomes from thematic analysis drawn were Planning, Funding, Governance, Awareness, Medical and technical capacity building, Policy development, Evaluation and Sustainability. Lack of financial resources allocation due to policies and legislation top the list of barriers. The lack of research and reliable data as to the number of persons suffering from hearing loss (HL) from birth and its economic cost to the state and individual remains a policy barrier.

Conclusion: The barriers to NHS are lack of financial resource allocation by the federal government, and lack of research and reliable statistics about Hearing Impairment (HI) and its economic cost.

Keywords: Hearing loss; Language development; Neonatal Screening; Policy; Quality of life.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Khan F, Amatya B, Sayed TM, Butt AW, Jamil K, Iqbal W, et al. World Health Organisation Global Disability Action Plan 2014-2021:Challenges and perspectives for physical medicine and rehabilitation in Pakistan. J Rehabil Med. 2017;49(1):10–21. - PubMed
    1. Mumtaz N, Habibullah S. Better late than never:Identification of children with hearing loss in Pakistan. Pak Armed Forces Med J. 2017;67(2):292–295.
    1. Tucci D, Merson MH, Wilson BS. A summary of the literature on global hearing impairment:current status and priorities for action. Otol Neurotol. 2010;31(1):31–41. - PubMed
    1. Verhaert N, Willems M, Van Kerschaver E, Desloovere C. Impact of early hearing screening and treatment on language development and education level:evaluation of 6 years of universal newborn hearing screening (ALGO) in Flanders, Belgium. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2008;72(5):599–608. - PubMed
    1. Olusanya B. Screening for neonatal deafness in resource-poor countries:challenges and solutions. Res Rep Neonatol. 2015;5:51–64. doi:10.2147/RRN.S61862.

LinkOut - more resources