Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2020 Apr 27;221(10):1677-1687.
doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiz633.

Estimating the Global Prevalence, Disease Progression, and Clinical Outcome of Hepatitis Delta Virus Infection

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Estimating the Global Prevalence, Disease Progression, and Clinical Outcome of Hepatitis Delta Virus Infection

Zhijiang Miao et al. J Infect Dis. .

Abstract

Background: Hepatitis delta virus (HDV) coinfects with hepatitis B virus (HBV) causing the most severe form of viral hepatitis. However, its exact global disease burden remains largely obscure. We aim to establish the global epidemiology, infection mode-stratified disease progression, and clinical outcome of HDV infection.

Methods: We conducted a meta-analysis with a random-effects model and performed data synthesis.

Results: The pooled prevalence of HDV is 0.80% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63-1.00) among the general population and 13.02% (95% CI, 11.96-14.11) among HBV carriers, corresponding to 48-60 million infections globally. Among HBV patients with fulminant hepatitis, cirrhosis, or hepatocellular carcinoma, HDV prevalence is 26.75% (95% CI, 19.84-34.29), 25.77% (95% CI, 20.62-31.27), and 19.80% (95% CI, 10.97-30.45), respectively. The odds ratio (OR) of HDV infection among HBV patients with chronic liver disease compared with asymptomatic controls is 4.55 (95% CI, 3.65-5.67). Hepatitis delta virus-coinfected patients are more likely to develop cirrhosis than HBV-monoinfected patients with OR of 3.84 (95% CI, 1.79-8.24). Overall, HDV infection progresses to cirrhosis within 5 years and to hepatocellular carcinoma within 10 years, on average.

Conclusions: Findings suggest that HDV poses a heavy global burden with rapid progression to severe liver diseases, urging effective strategies for screening, prevention, and treatment.

Keywords: cirrhosis; disease progression; epidemiology; hepatitis delta virus; hepatocellular carcinoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flowchart of study selection.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Global prevalence of hepatitis D virus (HDV) infection. (A) General population; (B) hepatitis B virus surface antigens-positive carriers. Blank means HDV-pooled prevalence is not applicable due to lacking HDV epidemiological data. First 10 counties for the estimates of HDV burden were listed, respectively.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
The epidemiological profile of hepatitis D virus (HDV) infection. (A) Prevalence of HDV among acute hepatitis B virus (HBV) patients. (B) Prevalence of HDV among chronic HBV patients. (C) Forest plot of HDV prevalence among patients with chronic liver diseases compared with asymptomatic controls. Data are pooled from a random-effects model. ASC, asymptomatic carrier; CH, chronic hepatitis; CI, confidence interval; FH, fulminant hepatitis; HBsAg, HBV surface antigen; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Schematic diagram of hepatitis D virus (HDV) infection and disease progression. (A) Hepatitis D virus infection patterns. Coinfection is that HDV and hepatitis B virus (HBV) simultaneously infect an individual or HDV infects the individual at the early stage after HBV infection. The essential diagnostic marker of this pattern is positive HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) and high titer of anti-hepatitis B core (HBc) immunoglobulin (Ig)M antibodies. Superinfection is that HDV infects the individual who has already established HBV infection or is a chronic HBV carrier (HBsAg positive). Anti-HBc IgM antibodies are absent in this pattern. HDV > HBV, HDV replication dominant; HDV ~ HBV, HDV and HBV codominant; HDV < HBV, HBV replication dominant. (B) Clinical progression of HDV infection. Pooled probability was shown with 95% confidence interval unless specifically indicated. Time was shown as mean (range). The total percentage exceed 100% after data synthesis.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Clinical outcome comparison between hepatitis D virus (HDV)-positive and HDV-negative patients. (A) Radar chart represents the composition of liver diseases among patients. (B) Forest plot of liver disease ratio among HDV-positive patients compared with HDV-negative patients. Data are pooled from a random-effects model. (C) The development of liver diseases among HDV-positive patients compared with HDV-negative patients. (D) The suppressive effect of HDV on hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication. Hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) and HBV deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) are the indicators of HBV replication. ASC, asymptomatic carrier; CI, confidence interval; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; OR, odds ratio.

Comment in

References

    1. Lempp FA, Ni Y, Urban S. Hepatitis delta virus: insights into a peculiar pathogen and novel treatment options. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 13:580–9. - PubMed
    1. Stockdale AJ, Chaponda M, Beloukas A, et al. . Prevalence of hepatitis D virus infection in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health 2017; 5:e992–1003. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen HY, Shen DT, Ji DZ, et al. . Prevalence and burden of hepatitis D virus infection in the global population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gut 2019; 68:512–21. - PubMed
    1. Shen DT, Ji DZ, Chen HY, Goyal H, Pan S, Xu HG. Hepatitis D: not a rare disease anymore: global update for 2017–2018. Gut 2019:pii: gutjnl-2019-318691. - PubMed
    1. Wedemeyer H, Negro F. Devil hepatitis D: an orphan disease or largely underdiagnosed? Gut 2019; 68:381–2. - PubMed

Publication types