Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jan-Dec;12(1):1692764.
doi: 10.1080/19420862.2019.1692764.

Dissecting the molecular basis of high viscosity of monospecific and bispecific IgG antibodies

Affiliations

Dissecting the molecular basis of high viscosity of monospecific and bispecific IgG antibodies

Cholpon Tilegenova et al. MAbs. 2020 Jan-Dec.

Abstract

Some antibodies exhibit elevated viscosity at high concentrations, making them poorly suited for therapeutic applications requiring administration by injection such as subcutaneous or ocular delivery. Here we studied an anti-IL-13/IL-17 bispecific IgG4 antibody, which has anomalously high viscosity compared to its parent monospecific antibodies. The viscosity of the bispecific IgG4 in solution was decreased by only ~30% in the presence of NaCl, suggesting electrostatic interactions are insufficient to fully explain the drivers of viscosity. Intriguingly, addition of arginine-HCl reduced the viscosity of the bispecific IgG4 by ~50% to its parent IgG level. These data suggest that beyond electrostatics, additional types of interactions such as cation-π and/or π-π may contribute to high viscosity more significantly than previously understood. Molecular dynamics simulations of antibody fragments in the mixed solution of free arginine and explicit water were conducted to identify hotspots involved in self-interactions. Exposed surface aromatic amino acids displayed an increased number of contacts with arginine. Mutagenesis of the majority of aromatic residues pinpointed by molecular dynamics simulations effectively decreased the solution's viscosity when tested experimentally. This mutational method to reduce the viscosity of a bispecific antibody was extended to a monospecific anti-GCGR IgG1 antibody with elevated viscosity. In all cases, point mutants were readily identified that both reduced viscosity and retained antigen-binding affinity. These studies demonstrate a new approach to mitigate high viscosity of some antibodies by mutagenesis of surface-exposed aromatic residues on complementarity-determining regions that may facilitate some clinical applications.

Keywords: Bispecific IgG; IgG; viscosity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
(a) Cartoon representation of monospecific and bispecific antibody formats investigated. The isotype for the anti-IL-17 antibody is IgG1, whereas the anti-IL-13 and BsIgG antibodies are both IgG4. All antibodies have κ light chains. Half-antibodies containing knobs-into-holes mutations34 (‘knob’ mutation (T366W) in the anti-IL-13 arm or ‘hole’ mutations (T366S:L368A:Y407V) in the anti-IL-17arm) were expressed and purified separately before assembly in vitro as described previously.35,36 A hinge stabilizing mutation (S228P) was introduced into the IgG4 to attenuate Fab arm exchange.37,38 (b) Viscosity of fragments (F(ab’)2 and Fab) or full-length anti-IL-13/IL-17 bispecific or its parent antibodies are shown. (c) The effect of 150 mM NaCl or 150 mM Arg-HCl on solution viscosity is shown. The dotted line represents the viscosity of parent IgG antibody level as a reference. Data shown are the mean values (n = 3, ± SD) measured by rheometer at 23ºC and 150 mg/mL total protein concentration in 20 mM His-HCl pH 6.0 (buffer) in the absence or presence of excipients.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
X-ray crystallographic structures of anti-IL-13 (lebrikizumab)40 and anti-IL-17 (MCAF5352A41) antibody Fabs complexed with their respective ligands displaying aromatic residues chosen for mutational studies. (a) View of anti-IL-13/IL-13 interface depicting important viscosity reducing residues (PDB 4I77).40 The anti-IL13 VH is cyan and VL is light pink, with dark cyan and magenta side chains within 4 Å of IL-13. IL-13 is gray with yellow epitope within 4 Å of anti-IL-13. (b) View of anti-IL-17/IL-17F interface depicting important residues (PDB 6PPG). Anti-IL-17F VH is cyan and VL is light pink, with dark cyan and magenta side chains within 4 Å of IL-17. IL-17F is gray with yellow epitope within 4 Å of anti-IL-17F. See the Supplementary Materials for the sequences for the variable domains for the anti-IL-13 (Figure S6) and anti-IL17 (Figure S7) antibodies.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
MD simulations of (a) anti-IL-13 (lebrikizumab40) and (b) anti-IL-17 (MCAF5352A41) variable heavy (VH) and variable light (VL) domains in the presence of arginine. Data shown are the mean number of arginine contacts from 20 independent simulations. Residues that show >2σ or >3σ deviations from the mean (μ) number of arginine contact number of all residues in chains are highlighted. Kabat numbering is used.42.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Viscosity of antibody variants. Monospecific anti-IL-13 IgG4 and anti-IL-17 IgG1 antibody variants were mixed with the parent anti-IL-17 IgG1 and anti-IL-13 IgG4 antibody counterparts, respectively, at a 1:1 ratio and a final total concentration of 150 mg/mL. The viscosity of the solutions was then measured by rheometer at 23ºC. (a) Viscosity of mixtures of anti-IL-13 charged variants and the anti-IL-17 parent antibody. (b) Viscosity of mixtures of anti-IL-17 charged variants and the anti-IL-13 parent antibody. (c) Viscosity of mixtures of anti-IL-13 and anti-IL-17 aromatic variants with their parent IgG antibody counterpart. (d) Viscosity of anti-IL-13/IL-17 BsIgG4 variants at 150 mg/mL final concentration. Data shown are the mean values (n = 2, ± SD) measured in 20 mM His-HCl buffer at pH 6.0. The dotted line shows the parent antibody viscosity level as a reference.

References

    1. The Antibody Society . List of approved antibodies. [cited 2019. Nov 19]. https://www.antibodysociety.org/resources/approved-antibodies/.
    1. Carter PJ, Lazar GA.. Next generation antibody drugs: pursuit of the ‘high-hanging fruit’. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2018;17:197–11. - PubMed
    1. Viola M, Sequeira J, Seiça R, Veiga F, Serra J, Santos AC, Ribeiro AJ. Subcutaneous delivery of monoclonal antibodies: how do we get there? J Control Release. 2018;286:301–14. - PubMed
    1. Jin JF, Zhu LL, Chen M, Xu HM, Wang HF, Feng XQ, Zhu XP, Zhou Q. The optimal choice of medication administration route regarding intravenous, intramuscular, and subcutaneous injection. Patient Prefer Adher. 2015;9:923–42. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Xu Y, Wang D, Mason B, Rossomando T, Li N, Liu D, Cheung JK, Xu W, Raghava S, Katiyar A, et al. Structure, heterogeneity and developability assessment of therapeutic antibodies. MAbs. 2019;11:239–64. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types