Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Nov 28;16(1):240.
doi: 10.1186/s12974-019-1648-4.

Monocarboxylate transporter 1 promotes classical microglial activation and pro-inflammatory effect via 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2, 6-biphosphatase 3

Affiliations

Monocarboxylate transporter 1 promotes classical microglial activation and pro-inflammatory effect via 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2, 6-biphosphatase 3

Liang Kong et al. J Neuroinflammation. .

Abstract

Background: Microglia, the resident macrophages of central nervous system, have been initially categorized into two opposite phenotypes: classical activation related to pro-inflammatory responses and alternative activation corresponding with anti-inflammatory reactions and tissue remodeling. The correlation between metabolic pattern and microglial activation has been identified. However, little is known about the mechanism of metabolism-mediated microglia polarization and pro-inflammatory effect.

Methods: Metabolic alteration was analyzed in different phenotypes of microglia in vitro. LPS-induced neuroinflammation and sickness behavior mouse model was used to investigate the effect of lactate on classical microglial activation in vivo.

Results: Glycolysis-related regulators, monocarboxylate transporter 1 (MCT1), MCT4, and pro-glycolytic enzyme 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2, 6-biphosphatase 3 (PFKFB3), were specifically increased in LPS-stimulated primary microglia and microglia cell line BV2. Knockdown of MCT1 suppressed glycolysis rate and decreased LPS-induced expression of iNOS, interleukin-1β (IL-1β), IL-6, and phosphorylation of STAT1 in BV2 cells. Importantly, MCT1 promoted PFKFB3 expression via hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (Hif-1α), and overexpression of PFKFB3 restored the classical activation of BV2 cells suppressed by MCT1 silence. All above strongly suggested that MCT1/PFKFB3 might accelerate LPS-induced classical polarization of microglia probably by promoting glycolysis. Interestingly, additional administration of moderate lactate, which may block the transport function of MCT1, decreased LPS-induced classical activation and expression of PFKFB3 in BV2 cells. Intracerebroventricular injection of lactate ameliorated LPS-induced sickness behavior and classical polarization of microglia in mice.

Conclusions: Our results demonstrate the key role of MCT1 in microglial classical activation and neuroinflammation in pathological conditions. In addition, lactate administration may be a potential therapy to suppress neuroinflammation by altering microglial polarization.

Keywords: Classical microglial polarization; Glycolysis; Lactate; MCT1; Neuroinflammation; PFKFB3.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
LPS-induced special increase of MCT1, MCT4, and PFKFB3 in BV2 cell line and primary microglia. a Representative morphology of BV2 cells after treatment with PBS, LPS, or IL-4. Scale bar = 200 μm. b Quantification of the mRNA levels of classical microglial markers and glycolysis-related regulatory factors after treatment with LPS for 24 h (n = 6–8 per group and errors represent S.E.M; t test). c Quantification of the mRNA levels of alternative M2 markers and glycolysis-related regulatory factors after treatment of IL-4 for 24 h (n = 5 per group; t test). d Representative immunoblots and relative quantification of iNOS, MCT1, MCT4, and PFKFB3 after treatment with PBS, LPS, or IL-4 (n = 6 per group; one-way ANOVA). e, f Quantification of the mRNA levels of these genes in primary cultured microglia in each group (n = 6 per group one-way ANOVA). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 versus PBS-treated group
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Knockdown of MCT1 inhibited LPS-stimulated classical microglial polarization and glycolysis rate in BV2 cells. a The interference efficiency of Lenti-siMCT1, Lenti-siMCT2, and Lenti-siMCT4, respectively, in BV2 cells (n = 6 per group and errors represent S.E.M; t test). b Quantification of the mRNA level of iNOS after treated with indicated lentivirus with or without LPS stimulation (n = 6–7 per group). c Quantification of the mRNA levels of IL-1β, IL-6, and STAT1, respectively, in each group (n = 5 per group). d Quantification of lactate levels in the cultured media in each group (n = 4 per group). e Quantification of the mRNA level of PFKFB3 in each group (n = 5–6 per group). f, g Representative immunoblots and relative quantification of iNOS, PFKFB3, and MCT1 in each group (n = 6 per group). h, i The real-time extracellular acidification rate was measured by the sequential addition of glucose, oligomycin, and 2-DG in each group (n = 5 per group). *p and #p < 0.05, **p and ##p < 0.01, two-way ANOVA followed by post hoc. Lenti-siCtr, Lenti-siMCT1, Lenti-siMCT2, and Lenti-siMCT4 are abbreviated as siCtr, siMCT1, siMCT2 and siMCT4, respectively
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Overexpression of PFKFB3 rescued MCT1 silence-induced suppression of classical microglial polarization in BV2 cells. a Representative immunoblots and relative quantification of Hif-1α in each group (n = 4 per group and errors represent S.E.M). b The overexpression efficiency of Lenti-MCT1 and quantification of the mRNA level of PFKFB3 in each group (n = 4 per group). KC7F2, an inhibitor of Hif-1α, 30 mM. c, Quantification of the mRNA level of iNOS, IL-1β, and IL-6 after treatment with Lenti-siMCT1 and Lenti-PFKFB3 with or without LPS (n = 6–9 per group). d, e Representative immunoblots and relative quantification of iNOS and STAT1 protein, respectively, 24 h after LPS stimulation in each group (n = 6 per group). f Representative immunoblots and relative quantification of STAT1 and p-STAT1 after stimulation with LPS for 3 h in each group (n = 5–6 per group). *p, #p, and &p < 0.05, **p, ##p, and &&p < 0.01, NS represents no significant difference; two-way ANOVA followed by post hoc
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Lactate suppressed LPS-induced classical microglial polarization in BV2 cells. a, b Quantification of the mRNA levels of iNOS and PFKFB3 in the treatment of lactate and LPS in BV2 cells (n = 9 per group and errors represent S.E.M). *p < 0.05, **p, and ##p < 0.01, two-way ANOVA followed by post hoc. ce Quantification of the mRNA levels of IL-1β, IL-6, and Hif-1α in the treatment of lactate, pyruvate, and LPS in BV2 cells (n = 4–7 per group one-way ANOVA)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Intracerebroventricular injection of lactate reduced classical microglial polarization and neuroinflammation in the hippocampus and substantia nigra. a, b Quantification of the mRNA levels of microglial M1 and M2 markers in the hippocampus and substantia nigra, respectively, after intraperitoneal injection of LPS and intraventricular injection of L-lactate (n = 6–9 per group). c, d Immunostaining of classical microglia markers, CD86, and Iba1, and quantification of Iba1+ cells and CD86+ cells in the hippocampus in each group (n = 5–6 per group). *p and #p < 0.05, **p and ##p < 0.01, two-way ANOVA followed by post hoc. Scale bar = 50 μm
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Intracerebroventricular injection of lactate ameliorated LPS-induced sickness behavior in mice. ac Quantification of mice total distance, reared times, and resting times by open field tests after intraperitoneal injection of LPS and intraventricular injection of L-lactate (n = 8 per group and errors represent S.E.M, **p and ##p < 0.01; two-way ANOVA followed by post hoc)
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Schematic representation of MCT1/PFKFB3-mediated classical microglial activation and pro-inflammatory effect

References

    1. Prinz M, Priller J. Microglia and brain macrophages in the molecular age: from origin to neuropsychiatric disease. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2014;15:300–312. doi: 10.1038/nrn3722. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hu X, Li P, Guo Y, Wang H, Leak RK, Chen S, Gao Y, Chen J. Microglia/macrophage polarization dynamics reveal novel mechanism of injury expansion after focal cerebral ischemia. Stroke. 2012;43:3063–3070. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.659656. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee Y, Lee SR, Choi SS, Yeo HG. Therapeutically targeting neuroinflammation and microglia after acute ischemic stroke. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:297241. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lemarchant S, Dunghana H, Pomeshchik Y, Leinonen H, Kolosowska N, Korhonen P, Kanninen KM, Garcia-Berrocoso T, Montaner J, Malm T, Koistinaho J. Anti-inflammatory effects of ADAMTS-4 in a mouse model of ischemic stroke. Glia. 2016;64:1492–1507. doi: 10.1002/glia.23017. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wang Y, Ulland TK, Ulrich JD, Song W, Tzaferis JA, Hole JT, Yuan P, Mahan TE, Shi Y, Gilfillan S, et al. TREM2-mediated early microglial response limits diffusion and toxicity of amyloid plaques. J Exp Med. 2016;213:667–675. doi: 10.1084/jem.20151948. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms