Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Nov 28;15(1):81.
doi: 10.1186/s12992-019-0525-3.

A conceptual framework for capacity strengthening of health research in conflict: the case of the Middle East and North Africa region

Affiliations

A conceptual framework for capacity strengthening of health research in conflict: the case of the Middle East and North Africa region

Nassim El Achi et al. Global Health. .

Abstract

Background: In conflict settings, research capacities have often been de-prioritized as resources are diverted to emergency needs, such as addressing elevated morbidity, mortality and health system challenges directly and/or indirectly associated to war. This has had an adverse long-term impact in such protracted conflicts such as those found in the Middle East and North Africa region (MENA), where research knowledge and skills have often been compromised. In this paper, we propose a conceptual framework for health research capacity strengthening that adapts existing models and frameworks in low- and middle-income countries and uses our knowledge of the MENA context to contextualise them for conflict settings.

Methods: The framework was synthesized using "best fit" framework synthesis methodology. Relevant literature, available in English and Arabic, was collected through PubMed, Google Scholar and Google using the keywords: capacity building; capacity strengthening; health research; framework and conflict. Grey literature was also assessed.

Results: The framework is composed of eight principal themes: "structural levels", "the influence of the external environment", "funding, community needs and policy environment", "assessing existing capacity and needs", "infrastructure and communication", "training, leadership and partnership", "adaptability and sustainability", and "monitoring and evaluation"; with each theme being supported by examples from the MENA region. Our proposed framework takes into consideration safety, infrastructure, communication and adaptability as key factors that affect research capacity strengthening in conflict. As it is the case more generally, funding, permissible political environments and sustainability are major determinants of success for capacity strengthening for health research programmes, though these are significantly more challenging in conflict settings. Nonetheless, health research capacity strengthening should remain a priority.

Conclusion: The model presented is the first framework that focuses on strengthening health research capacity in conflict with a focus on the MENA region. It should be viewed as a non-prescriptive reference tool for health researchers and practitioners, from various disciplines, involved in research capacity strengthening to evaluate, use, adapt and improve. It can be further extended to include representative indicators and can be later evaluated by assessing its efficacy for interventions in conflict settings.

Keywords: Capacity strengthening; Conceptual framework; Conflict; Health; MENA; Research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Cooke's Capacity building of health research framework [40]
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
DFID’s key elements of capacity building [41]
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Proposed conceptual framework for health research capacity strengthening in conflict

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. UNHCR. Worldwide displacement tops 70 million, UN Refugee Chief urges greater solidarity in response. [Updated June 19, 2019. Available from: https://www.unhcr.org/news/press/2019/6/5d03b22b4/worldwide-displacement.... Accessed 13 Oct 2019].
    1. Azar EE, Jureidini P, McLaurin R. Protracted social conflict; theory and practice in the Middle East. J Palest Stud. 1978;8(1):41–60. doi: 10.2307/2536101. - DOI
    1. El-Erian Mohamed A., Fischer Stanley. Economic and Political Impediments to Middle East Peace. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK; 2000. Is MENA a Region? The Scope for Regional Integration; pp. 70–86.
    1. Gasiorowski M. The government and politics of the Middle East and North Africa. London: Hachette; 2016.
    1. Bates I, Akoto AYO, Ansong D, Karikari P, Bedu-Addo G, Critchley J, et al. Evaluating health research capacity building: an evidence-based tool. PLoS Med. 2006;3(8):e299. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030299. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types