Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Nov 8:10:1057.
doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.01057. eCollection 2019.

Ensuring Best Practice in Genomic Education and Evaluation: A Program Logic Approach

Affiliations

Ensuring Best Practice in Genomic Education and Evaluation: A Program Logic Approach

Amy Nisselle et al. Front Genet. .

Abstract

Targeted genomic education and training of professionals have been identified as core components of strategies and implementation plans for the use of genomics in health care systems. Education needs to be effective and support the sustained and appropriate use of genomics in health care. Evaluation of education programs to identify effectiveness is challenging. Furthermore, those responsible for development and delivery are not necessarily trained in education and/or evaluation. Program logic models have been used to support the development and evaluation of education programs by articulating a logical explanation as to how a program intends to produce the desired outcomes. These are highly relevant to genomic education programs, but do not appear to have been widely used to date. To assist those developing and evaluating genomic education programs, and as a first step towards enabling identification of effective genomic education approaches, we developed a consensus program logic model for genomic education. We drew on existing literature and a co-design process with 24 international genomic education and evaluation experts to develop the model. The general applicability of the model to the development of programs was tested by program convenors across four diverse settings. Conveners reported on the utility and relevance of the logic model across development, delivery and evaluation. As a whole, their feedback suggests that the model is flexible and adaptive across university award programs, competency development and continuing professional development activities. We discuss this program logic model as a potential best practice mechanism for developing genomic education, and to support development of an evaluation framework and consistent standards to evaluate and report genomic education program outcomes and impacts.

Keywords: education; evaluation; genomic medicine; program logic; theory; workforce.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Summary of the Australian Genomics Workforce & Education “Effective Education” program of research.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Program logic model for genomic education interventions. 1After testing the model in four contexts a stakeholder management plan was added as a Planning stage deliverable. 2Testing also clarified that Project management aspects can span all stages so this component was removed.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Illustration of how the different program logic model components map to the development of clinical genomic workshops for pediatricians. 1(Herreid, 2005).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Illustration of how the program logic model can be used as a tool for reflection and targeted evaluation for quality improvement. 1Adult learning theory (Taylor and Hamdy, 2013); 2(Beetham and Sharpe, 2013); 3(Hase, 2009). 4The impact evaluation is not proceeding due to low participation.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Beetham H., Sharpe R. (2013). Rethinking Pedagogy for a Digital Age: Designing for 21st Century Learning. New York: Routledge.
    1. Bernstein R. J. (2011). Praxis and Action: Contemporary Philosophies of Human Activity. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    1. Campbell C., Silver I., Sherbino J., Cate O. T., Holmboe E. S. (2010). Competency-based continuing professional development. Med. Teach. 32, 657–662. 10.3109/0142159X.2010.500708 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carroll J. C., Wilson B. J., Allanson J., Grimshaw J., Blaine S. M., Meschino W. S., et al. (2011). GenetiKit: a randomized controlled trial to enhance delivery of genetics services by family physicians. Fam. Pract. 28, 615–623. 10.1093/fampra/cmr040 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Feero W. G., Green E. D. (2011). Genomics education for health care professionals in the 21st century. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 306, 989–990. 10.1001/jama.2011.1245 - DOI - PubMed