Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Oct 30:2019:6902420.
doi: 10.1155/2019/6902420. eCollection 2019.

Performance of the Afferent Limb of Rapid Response Systems in Managing Deteriorating Patients: A Systematic Review

Affiliations
Review

Performance of the Afferent Limb of Rapid Response Systems in Managing Deteriorating Patients: A Systematic Review

Marcello Difonzo. Crit Care Res Pract. .

Abstract

Introduction: The clinical components of the rapid response system (RRS) are the afferent limb, to ensure identification of in-hospital patients who deteriorate and activation of a response, and the efferent limb, to provide the response. This review aims to evaluate the factors that influence the performance of the afferent limb in managing deteriorating ward patients and their effects on patient outcomes.

Methods: A systematic review was performed for the years 1995-2017 by employing five electronic databases. Articles were included assessing the ability of the ward staffs to monitor, recognize, and escalate care to patient deterioration. The findings were summarized using a narrative approach.

Results: Thirty-one studies met the inclusion criteria. The analysis revealed major themes enclosing several factors affecting management of patients having sudden deterioration. The monitoring and recognition process was conditioned by the lack of recording of physiological parameters, the influence of facilitators, including staff education and training, and barriers, including human and environmental factors, and poor compliance with the calling criteria. The escalation of care process highlighted the influence of cultural barriers and personal judgment on RRS activation. Mainly, delayed team calls were factors strongly associated with the increased risk of unplanned admissions to the intensive care unit and length of stay, hospital length of stay and mortality, and 30-day mortality.

Conclusions: A combination of factors affects the timely identification and response to sudden deterioration by general ward staffs, leading to suboptimal care of patients, delayed or failed activation of RRS teams, and increased risks of worsening outcomes. The research efforts and clinical involvement to improve the governance of the factors limiting the performance of the afferent limb may ensure proper management of hospitalized patients showing physiological deterioration.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Rapid response systems and management of deteriorating ward patients.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The PRISMA diagram of the study search strategy.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lee A., Bishop G., Hillman K. M., Daffurn K. The medical emergency team. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care. 1995;23(2):183–186. doi: 10.1177/0310057x9502300210. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hillman K. Rapid response systems. Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine. 2008;12(2):77–81. doi: 10.4103/0972-5229.42561. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Soar J., McKay U. A revised role for the hospital cardiac arrest team? Resuscitation. 1998;38(3):145–149. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(98)00101-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pringle R., Hanson C., Falk N. L. Literature review on rapid response systems (RRS) 2011. http://docplayer.net/38769742-Literature-review-on-rapid-responsesystems....
    1. Goldhill D. R., McNarry A. Intensive care outreach services. Current Anaesthesia & Critical Care. 2002;13(6):356–361. doi: 10.1054/cacc.2003.0433. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources