Factors determining microbial colonization of liquid nitrogen storage tanks used for archiving biological samples
- PMID: 31781817
- PMCID: PMC6942587
- DOI: 10.1007/s00253-019-10242-1
Factors determining microbial colonization of liquid nitrogen storage tanks used for archiving biological samples
Abstract
The availability of bioresources is a precondition for life science research, medical applications, and diagnostics, but requires a dedicated quality management to guarantee reliable and safe storage. Anecdotal reports of bacterial isolates and sample contamination indicate that organisms may persist in liquid nitrogen (LN) storage tanks. To evaluate the safety status of cryocollections, we systematically screened organisms in the LN phase and in ice layers covering inner surfaces of storage tanks maintained in different biobanking facilities. We applied a culture-independent approach combining cell detection by epifluorescence microscopy with the amplification of group-specific marker genes and high-throughput sequencing of bacterial ribosomal genes. In the LN phase, neither cells nor bacterial 16S rRNA gene copy numbers were detectable (detection limit, 102 cells per ml, 103 gene copies per ml). In several cases, small numbers of bacteria of up to 104 cells per ml and up to 106 gene copies per ml, as well as Mycoplasma, or fungi were detected in the ice phase formed underneath the lids or accumulated at the bottom. The bacteria most likely originated from the stored materials themselves (Elizabethingia, Janthibacterium), the technical environment (Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter, Methylobacterium), or the human microbiome (Bacteroides, Streptococcus, Staphylococcus). In single cases, bacteria, Mycoplasma, fungi, and human cells were detected in the debris at the bottom of the storage tanks. In conclusion, the limited microbial load of the ice phase and in the debris of storage tanks can be effectively avoided by minimizing ice formation and by employing hermetically sealed sample containers.
Keywords: Amplicon sequencing; Biobanking; Cryobank; Cryopreservation; Microbial contamination; Risk/quality management; Safe storage.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that that they have no conflict of interest.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Microbial occurrence in liquid nitrogen storage tanks: a challenge for cryobanking?Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2021 Oct;105(20):7635-7650. doi: 10.1007/s00253-021-11531-4. Epub 2021 Sep 24. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2021. PMID: 34559283 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The origin, ultrastructure, and microbiology of the sediment accumulating in liquid nitrogen storage vessels.Cryobiology. 2005 Jun;50(3):231-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2005.01.005. Epub 2005 Apr 13. Cryobiology. 2005. PMID: 15925575
-
Bacterial and fungal contamination risks in human oocyte and embryo cryopreservation: open versus closed vitrification systems.Fertil Steril. 2016 Jul;106(1):127-132. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.03.024. Epub 2016 Mar 26. Fertil Steril. 2016. PMID: 27025548
-
Microbial contamination of embryos and semen during long term banking in liquid nitrogen.Cryobiology. 2003 Apr;46(2):146-52. doi: 10.1016/s0011-2240(03)00020-8. Cryobiology. 2003. PMID: 12686204
-
Biosafety in embryos and semen cryopreservation, storage, management and transport.Adv Exp Med Biol. 2014;753:429-65. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-0820-2_17. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2014. PMID: 25091919 Review.
Cited by
-
ESHRE good practice recommendations on fertility preservation involving testicular tissue cryopreservation in children receiving gonadotoxic therapies†.Hum Reprod. 2025 Aug 1;40(8):1391-1431. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaf106. Hum Reprod. 2025. PMID: 40574354 Free PMC article.
-
Resurrecting biodiversity: advanced assisted reproductive technologies and biobanking.Reprod Fertil. 2022 Jun 30;3(3):R121-R146. doi: 10.1530/RAF-22-0005. eCollection 2022 Jul 1. Reprod Fertil. 2022. PMID: 35928671 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Microbial occurrence in liquid nitrogen storage tanks: a challenge for cryobanking?Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2021 Oct;105(20):7635-7650. doi: 10.1007/s00253-021-11531-4. Epub 2021 Sep 24. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2021. PMID: 34559283 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Biosafety and biobanking: Current understanding and knowledge gaps.Biosaf Health. 2021 Oct;3(5):244-248. doi: 10.1016/j.bsheal.2021.06.003. Epub 2021 Jun 19. Biosaf Health. 2021. PMID: 34179747 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bach EM, Williams RJ, Hargreaves SK, Yang F, Hofmockel KS. Greatest soil microbial diversity found in micro-habitats. Soil Biol Biochem. 2018;118:217–226. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.12.018. - DOI
-
- Bajerski F, Stock J, Hanf B, Darienko T, Heine-Dobbernack E, Lorenz M, Naujox L, Keller ERJ, Schumacher HM, Friedl T, Eberth S, Mock H-P, Kniemeyer O, Overmann J. ATP content and cell viability as indicators for cryostress across the diversity of life. Front Psychol. 2018;9:921. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00921. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources